Reducing Treatment Errors Through Point-of-Care Glucometer Configuration
Published by Elsevier Inc..
BACKGROUND: Blood glucose (BG) testing is the most widely performed point-of-care (POC) test in a hospital setting. Multiple adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that treatment decisions may be affected by information displayed on the POC glucometer's results screen. A randomized, crossover simulation study was conducted to compare two results screen configurations for ACCU-CHEK Inform II, a POC glucometer.
METHODS: Prior to the study, a heuristic evaluation of the results screen configurations and a pilot study were conducted to select the two results screen configurations for comparison. At two multicampus medical centers, 66 nurse participants experienced two computer-based simulation scenarios that asked them to interpret glucometer readings and make treatment decisions for simulated patients with 32 mg/dL BG levels and subtle symptoms of hypoglycemia. One scenario displayed a numeric value ("32 mg/dL"), and the other displayed a range abbreviation, such as "RR LO" (out of reportable range; low). Treatment errors were recorded when the participant did not treat the hypoglycemic patient with glucose or when they administered insulin.
RESULTS: When ACCU-CHEK Inform II displayed an "RR LO" reading, 10.6% of participants made a treatment error, including 6.7% of participants with prior training on the meaning of an "RR LO" reading. None of the participants made a treatment error when ACCU-CHEK Inform II displayed a "32 mg/dL" reading.
CONCLUSION: Displaying a numeric BG reading eliminated potentially life-threating treatment errors caused by confusing range abbreviations. Manufacturers should consider these findings during future research and development of POC glucometers.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2018 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:44 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety - 44(2018), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 683-694 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Estock, Jamie L [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Blood Glucose |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.12.2019 Date Revised 17.12.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.014 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM287046974 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM287046974 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225053133.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.014 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0956.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM287046974 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)30064953 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1553-7250(17)30542-1 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Estock, Jamie L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Reducing Treatment Errors Through Point-of-Care Glucometer Configuration |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 06.12.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 17.12.2019 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Published by Elsevier Inc. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: Blood glucose (BG) testing is the most widely performed point-of-care (POC) test in a hospital setting. Multiple adverse events reported to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) revealed that treatment decisions may be affected by information displayed on the POC glucometer's results screen. A randomized, crossover simulation study was conducted to compare two results screen configurations for ACCU-CHEK Inform II, a POC glucometer | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Prior to the study, a heuristic evaluation of the results screen configurations and a pilot study were conducted to select the two results screen configurations for comparison. At two multicampus medical centers, 66 nurse participants experienced two computer-based simulation scenarios that asked them to interpret glucometer readings and make treatment decisions for simulated patients with 32 mg/dL BG levels and subtle symptoms of hypoglycemia. One scenario displayed a numeric value ("32 mg/dL"), and the other displayed a range abbreviation, such as "RR LO" (out of reportable range; low). Treatment errors were recorded when the participant did not treat the hypoglycemic patient with glucose or when they administered insulin | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: When ACCU-CHEK Inform II displayed an "RR LO" reading, 10.6% of participants made a treatment error, including 6.7% of participants with prior training on the meaning of an "RR LO" reading. None of the participants made a treatment error when ACCU-CHEK Inform II displayed a "32 mg/dL" reading | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Displaying a numeric BG reading eliminated potentially life-threating treatment errors caused by confusing range abbreviations. Manufacturers should consider these findings during future research and development of POC glucometers | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. | |
650 | 7 | |a Blood Glucose |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Insulin |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Pham, Ivan-Thibault |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Curinga, Holly K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sprague, Benjamin J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Boudreaux-Kelly, Monique Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Acevedo, Jeanette |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jacobs, Katrina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Joint Commission journal on quality and patient safety |d 2005 |g 44(2018), 11 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 683-694 |w (DE-627)NLM153492597 |x 1938-131X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:44 |g year:2018 |g number:11 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:683-694 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2018.03.014 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 44 |j 2018 |e 11 |b 01 |c 11 |h 683-694 |