'Self-screening' for malnutrition with an electronic version of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') in hospital outpatients : concurrent validity, preference and ease of use
Self-screening using an electronic version of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') has been developed but its implementation requires investigation. A total of 100 outpatients (mean age 50 (sd 16) years; 57 % male) self-screened with an electronic version of 'MUST' and were then screened by a healthcare professional (HCP) to assess concurrent validity. Ease of use, time to self-screen and prevalence of malnutrition were also assessed. A further twenty outpatients (mean age 54 (sd 15) years; 55 % male) examined preference between self- screening with paper and electronic versions of 'MUST'. For the three-category classification of 'MUST' (low, medium and high risk), agreement between electronic self-screening and HCP screening was 94 % (κ=0·74, se 0·092; P<0·001). For the two-category classification (low risk; medium+high risk) agreement was 96 % (κ=0·82, se 0·085; P<0·001), comparable with the previously reported paper-based self-screening. In all, 15 % of patients categorised themselves 'at risk' of malnutrition (5 % medium, 10 % high). Electronic self-screening took 3 min (sd 1·2 min), 40 % faster than previously reported for the paper-based version. Patients found the tool easy or very easy to understand (99 %) and complete (98 %). Patients that assessed both tools found the electronic tool easier to complete (65 %) and preferred it (55 %) to the paper version. Electronic self-screening using 'MUST' in a heterogeneous group of hospital outpatients is acceptable, user-friendly and has 'substantial to almost-perfect' agreement with HCP screening. The electronic format appears to be as agreeable and often the preferred format when compared with the validated paper-based 'MUST' self-screening tool.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2018 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:120 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The British journal of nutrition - 120(2018), 5 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 528-536 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Cawood, Abbie L [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 21.08.2019 Date Revised 10.12.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1017/S000711451800185X |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM286984466 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM286984466 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225053002.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1017/S000711451800185X |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0956.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM286984466 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)30058522 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cawood, Abbie L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a 'Self-screening' for malnutrition with an electronic version of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') in hospital outpatients |b concurrent validity, preference and ease of use |
264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 21.08.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Self-screening using an electronic version of the Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool ('MUST') has been developed but its implementation requires investigation. A total of 100 outpatients (mean age 50 (sd 16) years; 57 % male) self-screened with an electronic version of 'MUST' and were then screened by a healthcare professional (HCP) to assess concurrent validity. Ease of use, time to self-screen and prevalence of malnutrition were also assessed. A further twenty outpatients (mean age 54 (sd 15) years; 55 % male) examined preference between self- screening with paper and electronic versions of 'MUST'. For the three-category classification of 'MUST' (low, medium and high risk), agreement between electronic self-screening and HCP screening was 94 % (κ=0·74, se 0·092; P<0·001). For the two-category classification (low risk; medium+high risk) agreement was 96 % (κ=0·82, se 0·085; P<0·001), comparable with the previously reported paper-based self-screening. In all, 15 % of patients categorised themselves 'at risk' of malnutrition (5 % medium, 10 % high). Electronic self-screening took 3 min (sd 1·2 min), 40 % faster than previously reported for the paper-based version. Patients found the tool easy or very easy to understand (99 %) and complete (98 %). Patients that assessed both tools found the electronic tool easier to complete (65 %) and preferred it (55 %) to the paper version. Electronic self-screening using 'MUST' in a heterogeneous group of hospital outpatients is acceptable, user-friendly and has 'substantial to almost-perfect' agreement with HCP screening. The electronic format appears to be as agreeable and often the preferred format when compared with the validated paper-based 'MUST' self-screening tool | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a Validation Study | |
650 | 4 | |a HCP healthcare professional | |
650 | 4 | |a MUST Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool | |
650 | 4 | |a Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool | |
650 | 4 | |a Preference | |
650 | 4 | |a Self-screening | |
650 | 4 | |a Validity | |
700 | 1 | |a Walters, Emily R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sharp, Sarah K E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Elia, Marinos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Stratton, Rebecca J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The British journal of nutrition |d 1947 |g 120(2018), 5 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 528-536 |w (DE-627)NLM000000434 |x 1475-2662 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:120 |g year:2018 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:09 |g pages:528-536 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S000711451800185X |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 120 |j 2018 |e 5 |b 01 |c 09 |h 528-536 |