Animal-Protein Intake Is Associated with Insulin Resistance in Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2) Calibration Substudy Participants : A Cross-Sectional Analysis
Background: High intakes of total and animal protein are associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The influence of protein type on insulin resistance, a key precursor of T2D, has not been extensively studied. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the associations between dietary total, animal, and plant protein intakes as well as the animal-to-plant protein (AP) intake ratio with insulin resistance in middle-aged and older adults. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis in 548 participants (mean ± SD age: 66.2 ± 13.7 y) from the calibration substudy of the AHS-2 (Adventist Health Study 2) cohort. Participants consumed diets with a low AP intake ratio. Dietary intakes of total and particular types of protein were calculated from six 24-h dietary recalls. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on demographic, lifestyle, health, diet intake, and physical activity characteristics. Anthropometric variables including weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by using fasting serum glucose and insulin. Multiple linear regression models were used to test the relations between total and specific protein intakes with insulin resistance. Results: The ranges of dietary intakes of animal and plant protein and the AP intake ratio were 0.4-87.4 and 14.0-79.2 g/d and 0.02-4.43, respectively. Dietary intakes per 10-g/d increments of total protein (β: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.21) and animal protein (β: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.20) and the AP intake ratio (β: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.84) were positively related to HOMA-IR. Plant protein was not significantly related to insulin resistance. Conclusion: Total and animal protein intakes and the AP intake ratio were positively associated with HOMA-IR in adults with relatively a low intake of animal protein and a high consumption of plant protein.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:1 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Current developments in nutrition - 1(2017), 4 vom: 19. Apr., Seite e000299 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Azemati, Bahar [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
AHS-2 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Revised 21.04.2024 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3945/cdn.116.000299 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM285988611 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM285988611 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240421231820.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3945/cdn.116.000299 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n1382.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM285988611 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)29955699 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Azemati, Bahar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Animal-Protein Intake Is Associated with Insulin Resistance in Adventist Health Study 2 (AHS-2) Calibration Substudy Participants |b A Cross-Sectional Analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.04.2024 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Background: High intakes of total and animal protein are associated with the risk of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The influence of protein type on insulin resistance, a key precursor of T2D, has not been extensively studied. Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the associations between dietary total, animal, and plant protein intakes as well as the animal-to-plant protein (AP) intake ratio with insulin resistance in middle-aged and older adults. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis in 548 participants (mean ± SD age: 66.2 ± 13.7 y) from the calibration substudy of the AHS-2 (Adventist Health Study 2) cohort. Participants consumed diets with a low AP intake ratio. Dietary intakes of total and particular types of protein were calculated from six 24-h dietary recalls. Participants completed a self-administered questionnaire on demographic, lifestyle, health, diet intake, and physical activity characteristics. Anthropometric variables including weight, height, and waist circumference were measured. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated by using fasting serum glucose and insulin. Multiple linear regression models were used to test the relations between total and specific protein intakes with insulin resistance. Results: The ranges of dietary intakes of animal and plant protein and the AP intake ratio were 0.4-87.4 and 14.0-79.2 g/d and 0.02-4.43, respectively. Dietary intakes per 10-g/d increments of total protein (β: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.02, 0.21) and animal protein (β: 0.11; 95% CI: 0.01, 0.20) and the AP intake ratio (β: 1.82; 95% CI: 0.80, 2.84) were positively related to HOMA-IR. Plant protein was not significantly related to insulin resistance. Conclusion: Total and animal protein intakes and the AP intake ratio were positively associated with HOMA-IR in adults with relatively a low intake of animal protein and a high consumption of plant protein | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a AHS-2 | |
650 | 4 | |a HOMA-IR | |
650 | 4 | |a animal protein | |
650 | 4 | |a animal-to-plant protein intake ratio | |
650 | 4 | |a insulin resistance | |
700 | 1 | |a Rajaram, Sujatha |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jaceldo-Siegl, Karen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sabate, Joan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shavlik, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fraser, Gary E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Haddad, Ella H |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current developments in nutrition |d 2017 |g 1(2017), 4 vom: 19. Apr., Seite e000299 |w (DE-627)NLM280372787 |x 2475-2991 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g day:19 |g month:04 |g pages:e000299 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3945/cdn.116.000299 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 1 |j 2017 |e 4 |b 19 |c 04 |h e000299 |