Teaching Palatoplasty Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator
BACKGROUND: Cleft palate repair is a challenging procedure for cleft surgeons to teach. A novel high-fidelity cleft palate simulator has been described for surgeon training. This study evaluates the simulator's effect on surgeon procedural confidence and palatoplasty knowledge among learners.
METHODS: Plastic surgery trainees attended a palatoplasty workshop consisting of a didactic session on cleft palate anatomy and repair followed by a simulation session. Participants completed a procedural confidence questionnaire and palatoplasty knowledge test immediately before and after the workshop.
RESULTS: All participants reported significantly higher procedural confidence following the workshop (p < 0.05). Those with cleft palate surgery experience had higher procedural confidence before (p < 0.001) and after (p < 0.001) the session. Palatoplasty knowledge test scores increased in 90 percent of participants. The mean baseline test score was 28 ± 10.89 percent and 43 ± 18.86 percent following the workshop. Those with prior cleft palate experience did not have higher mean baseline test scores than those with no experience (30 percent versus 28 percent; p > 0.05), but did have significantly higher scores after the workshop (61 percent versus 35 percent; p < 0.05). All trainees strongly agreed or agreed that the simulator should be integrated into training and they would use it again.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effective use of a novel cleft palate simulator as a training tool to teach palatoplasty. Improved procedural confidence and knowledge were observed after a single session, with benefits seen among trainees both with and without previous cleft experience.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):980e-981e. - PMID 30489541 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2018 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2018 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:141 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Plastic and reconstructive surgery - 141(2018), 1 vom: 13. Jan., Seite 91e-98e |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Cheng, Homan [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 12.01.2018 Date Revised 06.01.2021 published: Print CommentIn: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):980e-981e. - PMID 30489541 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1097/PRS.0000000000003957 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM279444001 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM279444001 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231225022955.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231225s2018 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003957 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0931.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM279444001 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)29280875 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cheng, Homan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Teaching Palatoplasty Using a High-Fidelity Cleft Palate Simulator |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2018 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 12.01.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 06.01.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Dec;142(6):980e-981e. - PMID 30489541 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: Cleft palate repair is a challenging procedure for cleft surgeons to teach. A novel high-fidelity cleft palate simulator has been described for surgeon training. This study evaluates the simulator's effect on surgeon procedural confidence and palatoplasty knowledge among learners | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Plastic surgery trainees attended a palatoplasty workshop consisting of a didactic session on cleft palate anatomy and repair followed by a simulation session. Participants completed a procedural confidence questionnaire and palatoplasty knowledge test immediately before and after the workshop | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: All participants reported significantly higher procedural confidence following the workshop (p < 0.05). Those with cleft palate surgery experience had higher procedural confidence before (p < 0.001) and after (p < 0.001) the session. Palatoplasty knowledge test scores increased in 90 percent of participants. The mean baseline test score was 28 ± 10.89 percent and 43 ± 18.86 percent following the workshop. Those with prior cleft palate experience did not have higher mean baseline test scores than those with no experience (30 percent versus 28 percent; p > 0.05), but did have significantly higher scores after the workshop (61 percent versus 35 percent; p < 0.05). All trainees strongly agreed or agreed that the simulator should be integrated into training and they would use it again | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the effective use of a novel cleft palate simulator as a training tool to teach palatoplasty. Improved procedural confidence and knowledge were observed after a single session, with benefits seen among trainees both with and without previous cleft experience | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Podolsky, Dale J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fisher, David M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wong, Karen W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Lorenz, H Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Khosla, Rohit K |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Drake, James M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Forrest, Christopher R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Plastic and reconstructive surgery |d 1960 |g 141(2018), 1 vom: 13. Jan., Seite 91e-98e |w (DE-627)NLM000034967 |x 1529-4242 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:141 |g year:2018 |g number:1 |g day:13 |g month:01 |g pages:91e-98e |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000003957 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 141 |j 2018 |e 1 |b 13 |c 01 |h 91e-98e | ||