Comparison of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone and characterization of uterine response based on electrohysterogram
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the uterine activity response between women administered dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) and misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) for induction of labour (IOL) by analysing not only the traditional obstetric data but also the parameters extracted from uterine electrohysterogram (EHG).
METHODS: Two cohorts were defined: misoprostol (25-µg vaginal tablets; 251 women) and dinoprostone cohort (10 mg vaginal inserts; 249 women). All the mothers were induced by a medical indication of a Bishop Score < = 6.
RESULTS: The misoprostol cohort was associated with a shorter time to achieve active labour (p = .017) and vaginal delivery (p = .009) and with a higher percentage of vaginal delivery in less than 24 h in mothers with a very unfavourable cervix score (risk ratio (RR): 1.41, IC95% 1.17-1.69, p = .002). Successful inductions with misoprostol showed EHG parameter values significantly higher than basal state for amplitude and pseudo Montevideo units (PMU) 60' after drug administration, while spectral parameters significantly increased after 150'. This response was not observed in failed inductions. In the successful dinoprostone group, the duration and number of contractions increased significantly after 120', PMU did so after 180', and no significant differences were found for spectral parameters, possibly due to the slower pharmacokinetics of this drug.
CONCLUSION: Successful inductions of labour by misoprostol are associated with earlier effective contractions than in labours induced by dinoprostone.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:32 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians - 32(2019), 10 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 1586-1594 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Benalcazar-Parra, Carlos [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 23.05.2019 Date Revised 23.05.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/14767058.2017.1410791 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM279156049 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM279156049 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225022318.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14767058.2017.1410791 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0930.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM279156049 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)29251182 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Benalcazar-Parra, Carlos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparison of labour induction with misoprostol and dinoprostone and characterization of uterine response based on electrohysterogram |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 23.05.2019 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 23.05.2019 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to compare the uterine activity response between women administered dinoprostone (prostaglandin E2) and misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) for induction of labour (IOL) by analysing not only the traditional obstetric data but also the parameters extracted from uterine electrohysterogram (EHG) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Two cohorts were defined: misoprostol (25-µg vaginal tablets; 251 women) and dinoprostone cohort (10 mg vaginal inserts; 249 women). All the mothers were induced by a medical indication of a Bishop Score < = 6 | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The misoprostol cohort was associated with a shorter time to achieve active labour (p = .017) and vaginal delivery (p = .009) and with a higher percentage of vaginal delivery in less than 24 h in mothers with a very unfavourable cervix score (risk ratio (RR): 1.41, IC95% 1.17-1.69, p = .002). Successful inductions with misoprostol showed EHG parameter values significantly higher than basal state for amplitude and pseudo Montevideo units (PMU) 60' after drug administration, while spectral parameters significantly increased after 150'. This response was not observed in failed inductions. In the successful dinoprostone group, the duration and number of contractions increased significantly after 120', PMU did so after 180', and no significant differences were found for spectral parameters, possibly due to the slower pharmacokinetics of this drug | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Successful inductions of labour by misoprostol are associated with earlier effective contractions than in labours induced by dinoprostone | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Cervical ripening | |
650 | 4 | |a drug effects | |
650 | 4 | |a labour Induction | |
650 | 4 | |a signal interpretation | |
650 | 4 | |a surface electromyography | |
650 | 7 | |a Oxytocics |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Misoprostol |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 0E43V0BB57 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Dinoprostone |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a K7Q1JQR04M |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Monfort-Orti, Rogelio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ye-Lin, Yiyao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Prats-Boluda, Gema |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Alberola-Rubio, Jose |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Perales, Alfredo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Garcia-Casado, Javier |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians |d 2002 |g 32(2019), 10 vom: 01. Mai, Seite 1586-1594 |w (DE-627)NLM121648222 |x 1476-4954 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2019 |g number:10 |g day:01 |g month:05 |g pages:1586-1594 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2017.1410791 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 32 |j 2019 |e 10 |b 01 |c 05 |h 1586-1594 |