Facebook and Twitter vaccine sentiment in response to measles outbreaks
Social media posts regarding measles vaccination were classified as pro-vaccination, expressing vaccine hesitancy, uncertain, or irrelevant. Spearman correlations with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reported measles cases and differenced smoothed cumulative case counts over this period were reported (using time series bootstrap confidence intervals). A total of 58,078 Facebook posts and 82,993 tweets were identified from 4 January 2009 to 27 August 2016. Pro-vaccination posts were correlated with the US weekly reported cases (Facebook: Spearman correlation 0.22 (95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.34), Twitter: 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.34)). Vaccine-hesitant posts, however, were uncorrelated with measles cases in the United States (Facebook: 0.01 (95% confidence interval: -0.13 to 0.14), Twitter: 0.0011 (95% confidence interval: -0.12 to 0.12)). These findings may result from more consistent social media engagement by individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy, contrasted with media- or event-driven episodic interest on the part of individuals favoring current policy.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2019 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2019 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:25 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Health informatics journal - 25(2019), 3 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 1116-1132 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Deiner, Michael S [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Journal Article |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.07.2020 Date Revised 01.09.2020 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1177/1460458217740723 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM278145752 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM278145752 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225015904.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2019 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1460458217740723 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0927.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM278145752 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)29148313 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Deiner, Michael S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Facebook and Twitter vaccine sentiment in response to measles outbreaks |
264 | 1 | |c 2019 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 16.07.2020 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 01.09.2020 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Social media posts regarding measles vaccination were classified as pro-vaccination, expressing vaccine hesitancy, uncertain, or irrelevant. Spearman correlations with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-reported measles cases and differenced smoothed cumulative case counts over this period were reported (using time series bootstrap confidence intervals). A total of 58,078 Facebook posts and 82,993 tweets were identified from 4 January 2009 to 27 August 2016. Pro-vaccination posts were correlated with the US weekly reported cases (Facebook: Spearman correlation 0.22 (95% confidence interval: 0.09 to 0.34), Twitter: 0.21 (95% confidence interval: 0.06 to 0.34)). Vaccine-hesitant posts, however, were uncorrelated with measles cases in the United States (Facebook: 0.01 (95% confidence interval: -0.13 to 0.14), Twitter: 0.0011 (95% confidence interval: -0.12 to 0.12)). These findings may result from more consistent social media engagement by individuals expressing vaccine hesitancy, contrasted with media- or event-driven episodic interest on the part of individuals favoring current policy | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 4 | |a measles | |
650 | 4 | |a patient compliance | |
650 | 4 | |a social media | |
650 | 4 | |a treatment refusal | |
650 | 4 | |a vaccination | |
700 | 1 | |a Fathy, Cherie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kim, Jessica |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Niemeyer, Katherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ramirez, David |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ackley, Sarah F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Liu, Fengchen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lietman, Thomas M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Porco, Travis C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Health informatics journal |d 2006 |g 25(2019), 3 vom: 01. Sept., Seite 1116-1132 |w (DE-627)NLM165819111 |x 1741-2811 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:25 |g year:2019 |g number:3 |g day:01 |g month:09 |g pages:1116-1132 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1460458217740723 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 25 |j 2019 |e 3 |b 01 |c 09 |h 1116-1132 |