Customized Titanium Mesh Based on the 3D Printed Model vs. Manual Intraoperative Bending of Titanium Mesh for Reconstructing of Orbital Bone Fracture : A Randomized Clinical Trial
Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epubbenthamscience.org..
BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of customized patient-specific titanium mesh based on 3D printed model with intra-operative bending of titanium mesh for reconstructing of orbital floor fracture.
METHODS: This study was prospectively conducted on 10 patients with unilateral orbital floor fractures caused by accident or falls. In intervention group (n=5), the CT-scan slices were used for generating 3D reconstruction of both affected and unaffected orbits. Then, a 3D printed template of mirrored unaffected orbit was produced to mold the titanium mesh. The titanium mesh in conventional group (n=5) was bended only manually and intraoperatively by surgeon and positioned over the bony defect. All patients were followed-up within 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after surgery for assessing enophthalmos, diplopia and other complications.
RESULTS: Of 10 patients of the study only two patients in intervention group had preoperative vertical dystopia or diplopia which had been resolved after intervention. The mean enophthalmos at baseline and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after surgery in control group were 3.8±0.7, 2.4±0.8, 2.4±0.8, and 2.4±0.8 mm, respectively, and in intervention group were 2.6±0.8, 0.35 ± 0.4, 0.35 ± 0.4 and 0.35 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The mean enophthalmos did not differ significantly at baseline between two groups, while two groups showed significant difference after surgery.
CONCLUSION: Finally, we concluded that the placement of patient-specific titanium implant for reconstructing of orbital bone fracture led to better outcomes when compared to manual bending in terms of enophthalmos and other complications.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Reviews on recent clinical trials - 12(2017), 3 vom: 17., Seite 154-158 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Raisian, Shahrokh [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
3D printed model |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.08.2018 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.2174/1574887112666170821165206 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM275020134 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM275020134 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231225004736.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231225s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2174/1574887112666170821165206 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0916.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM275020134 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)28828975 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Raisian, Shahrokh |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Customized Titanium Mesh Based on the 3D Printed Model vs. Manual Intraoperative Bending of Titanium Mesh for Reconstructing of Orbital Bone Fracture |b A Randomized Clinical Trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 06.08.2018 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epubbenthamscience.org. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: This study was aimed to compare the efficacy of customized patient-specific titanium mesh based on 3D printed model with intra-operative bending of titanium mesh for reconstructing of orbital floor fracture | ||
520 | |a METHODS: This study was prospectively conducted on 10 patients with unilateral orbital floor fractures caused by accident or falls. In intervention group (n=5), the CT-scan slices were used for generating 3D reconstruction of both affected and unaffected orbits. Then, a 3D printed template of mirrored unaffected orbit was produced to mold the titanium mesh. The titanium mesh in conventional group (n=5) was bended only manually and intraoperatively by surgeon and positioned over the bony defect. All patients were followed-up within 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after surgery for assessing enophthalmos, diplopia and other complications | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of 10 patients of the study only two patients in intervention group had preoperative vertical dystopia or diplopia which had been resolved after intervention. The mean enophthalmos at baseline and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months after surgery in control group were 3.8±0.7, 2.4±0.8, 2.4±0.8, and 2.4±0.8 mm, respectively, and in intervention group were 2.6±0.8, 0.35 ± 0.4, 0.35 ± 0.4 and 0.35 ± 0.4 mm, respectively. The mean enophthalmos did not differ significantly at baseline between two groups, while two groups showed significant difference after surgery | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Finally, we concluded that the placement of patient-specific titanium implant for reconstructing of orbital bone fracture led to better outcomes when compared to manual bending in terms of enophthalmos and other complications | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a 3D printed model | |
650 | 4 | |a diplopia | |
650 | 4 | |a enophthalmos | |
650 | 4 | |a orbital fractures | |
650 | 4 | |a surgical mesh | |
650 | 4 | |a titanium | |
650 | 7 | |a Titanium |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a D1JT611TNE |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Fallahi, Hamid Reza |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Khiabani, Kazem S |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Heidarizadeh, Mehdi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Azdoo, Sadaf |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Reviews on recent clinical trials |d 2006 |g 12(2017), 3 vom: 17., Seite 154-158 |w (DE-627)NLM178749699 |x 1876-1038 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g day:17 |g pages:154-158 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1574887112666170821165206 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2017 |e 3 |b 17 |h 154-158 |