Healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes initiating saxagliptin or linagliptin : a US-based claims analysis
OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare costs of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after initiation of saxagliptin or linagliptin, two antidiabetic medications in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor medication class.
METHODS: Patients with T2D who were at least 18 years old and initiated saxagliptin or linagliptin (index date) between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. All-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related costs (T2D diagnosis on a medical claim and/or an antidiabetic medication claim) were measured in the 1 year follow-up period. Saxagliptin and linagliptin initiators were matched using propensity score methods. Cost ratios (CRs) and predicted costs were estimated from generalized linear models and recycled predictions.
RESULTS: There were 34,560 saxagliptin initiators and 18,175 linagliptin initiators identified (mean ages 57 and 59; 55% and 56% male, respectively). Before matching, saxagliptin initiators had significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs than linagliptin initiators (mean = $15,335 [SD $28,923] vs. mean = $20,069 [SD $48,541], p < .001) and significantly lower diabetes-related total healthcare costs (mean = $6109 [SD $13,851] vs. mean = $7393 [SD $26,041], p < .001). In matched analyses (n = 16,069 per cohort), saxagliptin initiators had lower all-cause follow-up costs than linagliptin initiators (CR = 0.953, 95% CI = 0.932-0.974, p < .001; predicted costs = $17,211 vs. $18,068). There was no significant difference in diabetes-related total costs after matching; however, diabetes-related medical costs were significantly lower for saxagliptin initiators (CR = 0.959, 95% CI = 0.927-0.993, p = 0.017; predicted costs = $3989 vs. $4159).
CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with T2D initiating treatment with saxagliptin had lower total all-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related medical costs over 1 year compared with patients initiating treatment with linagliptin.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Current medical research and opinion - 33(2017), 10 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 1869-1877 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Kong, Amanda M [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.03.2018 Date Revised 02.12.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1080/03007995.2017.1343187 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM272926787 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM272926787 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224235927.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/03007995.2017.1343187 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0909.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM272926787 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)28613952 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Kong, Amanda M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Healthcare costs among adults with type 2 diabetes initiating saxagliptin or linagliptin |b a US-based claims analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.03.2018 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To compare healthcare costs of adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) after initiation of saxagliptin or linagliptin, two antidiabetic medications in the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor medication class | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients with T2D who were at least 18 years old and initiated saxagliptin or linagliptin (index date) between 1 June 2011 and 30 June 2014 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Supplemental Databases. All-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related costs (T2D diagnosis on a medical claim and/or an antidiabetic medication claim) were measured in the 1 year follow-up period. Saxagliptin and linagliptin initiators were matched using propensity score methods. Cost ratios (CRs) and predicted costs were estimated from generalized linear models and recycled predictions | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: There were 34,560 saxagliptin initiators and 18,175 linagliptin initiators identified (mean ages 57 and 59; 55% and 56% male, respectively). Before matching, saxagliptin initiators had significantly lower all-cause total healthcare costs than linagliptin initiators (mean = $15,335 [SD $28,923] vs. mean = $20,069 [SD $48,541], p < .001) and significantly lower diabetes-related total healthcare costs (mean = $6109 [SD $13,851] vs. mean = $7393 [SD $26,041], p < .001). In matched analyses (n = 16,069 per cohort), saxagliptin initiators had lower all-cause follow-up costs than linagliptin initiators (CR = 0.953, 95% CI = 0.932-0.974, p < .001; predicted costs = $17,211 vs. $18,068). There was no significant difference in diabetes-related total costs after matching; however, diabetes-related medical costs were significantly lower for saxagliptin initiators (CR = 0.959, 95% CI = 0.927-0.993, p = 0.017; predicted costs = $3989 vs. $4159) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Adult patients with T2D initiating treatment with saxagliptin had lower total all-cause healthcare costs and diabetes-related medical costs over 1 year compared with patients initiating treatment with linagliptin | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Type 2 diabetes mellitus | |
650 | 4 | |a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor | |
650 | 4 | |a health expenditures | |
650 | 4 | |a healthcare costs | |
650 | 7 | |a Dipeptides |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Hypoglycemic Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Linagliptin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 3X29ZEJ4R2 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a saxagliptin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 9GB927LAJW |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Adamantane |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a PJY633525U |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Farahbakhshian, Sepehr |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pendergraft, Trudy |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Brouillette, Matthew A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mukherjee, Biswarup |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Smith, David M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sheehan, John J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Current medical research and opinion |d 1972 |g 33(2017), 10 vom: 06. Okt., Seite 1869-1877 |w (DE-627)NLM000081019 |x 1473-4877 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2017 |g number:10 |g day:06 |g month:10 |g pages:1869-1877 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2017.1343187 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 33 |j 2017 |e 10 |b 06 |c 10 |h 1869-1877 |