Choice among two and three alternatives

© 2017 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior..

Although choice between two alternatives has been widely researched, fewer studies have examined choice across multiple (more than two) alternatives. Past models of choice behavior predict that the number of alternatives should not affect relative response allocation, but more recent research has found violations of this principle. Five pigeons were presented with three concurrently scheduled alternatives. Relative reinforcement rates across these alternatives were assigned 9:3:1. In some conditions three keys were available; in others, only two keys were available. The number of available alternatives did not affect relative response rates for pairs of alternatives; there were no significant differences in behavior between the two and three key conditions. For two birds in the three-alternative conditions and three birds in the two-alternative conditions, preference was more extreme for the pair of alternatives with the lower overall pairwise reinforcer rate (3:1) than the pair with higher overall reinforcer rate (9:3). However, when responding during the changeover was removed three birds showed the opposite pattern in the three-alternative conditions; preference was more extreme for the pair of alternatives with the higher overall reinforcer rate. These findings differ from past research and do not support established theories of choice behavior.

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2017

Erschienen:

2017

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:107

Enthalten in:

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior - 107(2017), 3 vom: 03. Mai, Seite 369-387

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Beeby, Emma [VerfasserIn]
Alsop, Brent [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

Choice
Concurrent schedules
Constant-ratio rule
Journal Article
Multiple alternatives
Pigeon

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 19.04.2018

Date Revised 10.12.2019

published: Print

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1002/jeab.258

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM272010170