Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients on Hemodialysis
Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology..
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients undergoing hemodialysis.
DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested case-control analysis of patients on hemodialysis after receipt of DES and DAPT treatment was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2007-2011. Cases of myocardial infarction or death within 1 year after DES implantation were matched one-to-one with control patients. Odds ratios were calculated to compare DAPT continuation with discontinuation. Additionally, a propensity score-adjusted 6-month landmark cohort analysis was also conducted to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of prolonged (>6 months) compared with ≤6 months of DAPT use. The primary outcomes were death and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding.
RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, patients who continued DAPT had a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P=0.003), whereas this association became statistically nonsignificant when compared with patients who discontinued DAPT for the period between 6 and 12 months after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.04). In the propensity score-adjusted cohort analysis, >6 months of DAPT use was not associated with different primary or secondary outcomes than shorter-term use.
CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the clinical effectiveness of extended DAPT in a hemodialysis population may be tempered after 6 months post-DES implantation.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN - 12(2017), 2 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 262-271 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Chen, Yung-Tai [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.12.2017 Date Revised 13.08.2023 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.2215/CJN.04430416 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM268752729 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM268752729 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224223230.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.2215/CJN.04430416 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0895.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM268752729 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)28174317 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Chen, Yung-Tai |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Dual Antiplatelet Therapy and Clinical Outcomes after Coronary Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation in Patients on Hemodialysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 20.12.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 13.08.2023 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2017 by the American Society of Nephrology. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the benefits and risks of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after coronary drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients undergoing hemodialysis | ||
520 | |a DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: A nested case-control analysis of patients on hemodialysis after receipt of DES and DAPT treatment was conducted using data from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database for the period 2007-2011. Cases of myocardial infarction or death within 1 year after DES implantation were matched one-to-one with control patients. Odds ratios were calculated to compare DAPT continuation with discontinuation. Additionally, a propensity score-adjusted 6-month landmark cohort analysis was also conducted to evaluate the long-term benefits and risks of prolonged (>6 months) compared with ≤6 months of DAPT use. The primary outcomes were death and myocardial infarction. The secondary outcomes were ischemic stroke, revascularization, and major bleeding | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: In the nested case-control analysis, patients who continued DAPT had a lower rate of death or myocardial infarction within 1 year after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 0.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.36 to 0.81; P=0.003), whereas this association became statistically nonsignificant when compared with patients who discontinued DAPT for the period between 6 and 12 months after receipt of a DES (adjusted odds ratio, 1.51; 95% confidence interval, 0.75 to 3.04). In the propensity score-adjusted cohort analysis, >6 months of DAPT use was not associated with different primary or secondary outcomes than shorter-term use | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that the clinical effectiveness of extended DAPT in a hemodialysis population may be tempered after 6 months post-DES implantation | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Observational Study | |
650 | 4 | |a 2′-deoxythymidylyl-(3′-5′)-2′-deoxyadenosine | |
650 | 4 | |a Cohort | |
650 | 4 | |a Drug-Eluting Stents | |
650 | 4 | |a Epidemiology and outcomes | |
650 | 4 | |a Hemorrhage | |
650 | 4 | |a Humans | |
650 | 4 | |a Myocardial Infarction | |
650 | 4 | |a National Health Programs | |
650 | 4 | |a Odds Ratio | |
650 | 4 | |a Propensity Score | |
650 | 4 | |a Risk Assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a Stroke | |
650 | 4 | |a Studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Taiwan | |
650 | 4 | |a Treatment Outcome | |
650 | 4 | |a coronary artery disease | |
650 | 4 | |a hemodialysis | |
650 | 4 | |a renal dialysis | |
650 | 7 | |a Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Clopidogrel |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a A74586SNO7 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ticlopidine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a OM90ZUW7M1 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Aspirin |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a R16CO5Y76E |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Hung-Ta |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hsu, Chien-Yi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chao, Pei-Wen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kuo, Shu-Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ou, Shuo-Ming |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shih, Chia-Jen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN |d 2006 |g 12(2017), 2 vom: 07. Feb., Seite 262-271 |w (DE-627)NLM172123720 |x 1555-905X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2017 |g number:2 |g day:07 |g month:02 |g pages:262-271 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2215/CJN.04430416 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2017 |e 2 |b 07 |c 02 |h 262-271 |