From Here to Autonomy
As autonomous and semiautonomous systems are developed for automotive, aviation, cyber, robotics and other applications, the ability of human operators to effectively oversee and interact with them when needed poses a significant challenge. An automation conundrum exists in which as more autonomy is added to a system, and its reliability and robustness increase, the lower the situation awareness of human operators and the less likely that they will be able to take over manual control when needed. The human-autonomy systems oversight model integrates several decades of relevant autonomy research on operator situation awareness, out-of-the-loop performance problems, monitoring, and trust, which are all major challenges underlying the automation conundrum. Key design interventions for improving human performance in interacting with autonomous systems are integrated in the model, including human-automation interface features and central automation interaction paradigms comprising levels of automation, adaptive automation, and granularity of control approaches. Recommendations for the design of human-autonomy interfaces are presented and directions for future research discussed.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:59 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Human factors - 59(2017), 1 vom: 02. Feb., Seite 5-27 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Endsley, Mica R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Adaptive automation |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.09.2017 Date Revised 08.03.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1177/0018720816681350 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM268544158 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM268544158 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224222841.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0018720816681350 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0895.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM268544158 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)28146676 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Endsley, Mica R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a From Here to Autonomy |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.09.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 08.03.2018 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a As autonomous and semiautonomous systems are developed for automotive, aviation, cyber, robotics and other applications, the ability of human operators to effectively oversee and interact with them when needed poses a significant challenge. An automation conundrum exists in which as more autonomy is added to a system, and its reliability and robustness increase, the lower the situation awareness of human operators and the less likely that they will be able to take over manual control when needed. The human-autonomy systems oversight model integrates several decades of relevant autonomy research on operator situation awareness, out-of-the-loop performance problems, monitoring, and trust, which are all major challenges underlying the automation conundrum. Key design interventions for improving human performance in interacting with autonomous systems are integrated in the model, including human-automation interface features and central automation interaction paradigms comprising levels of automation, adaptive automation, and granularity of control approaches. Recommendations for the design of human-autonomy interfaces are presented and directions for future research discussed | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a adaptive automation | |
650 | 4 | |a autonomy | |
650 | 4 | |a human–automation interaction | |
650 | 4 | |a level of automation | |
650 | 4 | |a monitoring | |
650 | 4 | |a situation awareness | |
650 | 4 | |a trust | |
650 | 4 | |a vigilance | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Human factors |d 1962 |g 59(2017), 1 vom: 02. Feb., Seite 5-27 |w (DE-627)NLM000220442 |x 1547-8181 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:59 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g day:02 |g month:02 |g pages:5-27 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720816681350 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 59 |j 2017 |e 1 |b 02 |c 02 |h 5-27 |