Rates and predictors of exposure to Legionella pneumophila in the United States among dental practitioners : 2002 through 2012
Copyright © 2017 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors compared the odds of exposure to Legionella pneumophila among currently active dental practitioners with that of nonpractitioners and evaluated demographic and clinical practice predictors of exposure.
METHODS: The authors obtained demographic characteristics and dental practice behaviors from participants in the annual American Dental Association Health Screening Program survey administered from 2002 through 2012. The authors assayed serum samples obtained from participants for L pneumophila antibodies. The authors used an adjusted logit model to evaluate predictors of positive results.
RESULTS: Among 5,431 participants, approximately 10% were positive for L pneumophila, with no significant differences between dental practitioners and nonpractitioners. Geographic location was the only significant predictor of seropositivity, with no increased risk of being exposed to L pneumophila associated with age, race, sex, years in practice, hours of practice per week, use of barrier protection, or infection control practices.
CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of L pneumophila antibodies was 10.4% among dental and nondental personnel. US Census division was the only significant predictor of seropositivity. The authors conclude that provision of dental care did not increase the risk of being exposed to Legionella.
PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists should be aware of the prevalence of Legionella species in their practice areas to understand their personal risk of developing an infection.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:148 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) - 148(2017), 3 vom: 15. März, Seite 164-171 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Estrich, Cameron G [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Antibodies, Bacterial |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.10.2018 Date Revised 30.03.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.032 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM268372152 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM268372152 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224222531.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.032 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0894.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM268372152 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)28126227 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0002-8177(16)30962-X | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Estrich, Cameron G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Rates and predictors of exposure to Legionella pneumophila in the United States among dental practitioners |b 2002 through 2012 |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 05.10.2018 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 30.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2017 American Dental Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: In this study, the authors compared the odds of exposure to Legionella pneumophila among currently active dental practitioners with that of nonpractitioners and evaluated demographic and clinical practice predictors of exposure | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The authors obtained demographic characteristics and dental practice behaviors from participants in the annual American Dental Association Health Screening Program survey administered from 2002 through 2012. The authors assayed serum samples obtained from participants for L pneumophila antibodies. The authors used an adjusted logit model to evaluate predictors of positive results | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Among 5,431 participants, approximately 10% were positive for L pneumophila, with no significant differences between dental practitioners and nonpractitioners. Geographic location was the only significant predictor of seropositivity, with no increased risk of being exposed to L pneumophila associated with age, race, sex, years in practice, hours of practice per week, use of barrier protection, or infection control practices | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of L pneumophila antibodies was 10.4% among dental and nondental personnel. US Census division was the only significant predictor of seropositivity. The authors conclude that provision of dental care did not increase the risk of being exposed to Legionella | ||
520 | |a PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Dentists should be aware of the prevalence of Legionella species in their practice areas to understand their personal risk of developing an infection | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Dentistry | |
650 | 4 | |a L pneumophila | |
650 | 4 | |a Legionella | |
650 | 4 | |a dental unit waterlines | |
650 | 4 | |a infection control | |
650 | 7 | |a Antibodies, Bacterial |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Gruninger, Stephen E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lipman, Ruth D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) |d 1946 |g 148(2017), 3 vom: 15. März, Seite 164-171 |w (DE-627)NLM000071870 |x 1943-4723 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:148 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g day:15 |g month:03 |g pages:164-171 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.adaj.2016.11.032 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 148 |j 2017 |e 3 |b 15 |c 03 |h 164-171 |