Surviving Sepsis Campaign : International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

OBJECTIVE: To provide an update to "Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2012".

DESIGN: A consensus committee of 55 international experts representing 25 international organizations was convened. Nominal groups were assembled at key international meetings (for those committee members attending the conference). A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. A stand-alone meeting was held for all panel members in December 2015. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among subgroups and among the entire committee served as an integral part of the development.

METHODS: The panel consisted of five sections: hemodynamics, infection, adjunctive therapies, metabolic, and ventilation. Population, intervention, comparison, and outcomes (PICO) questions were reviewed and updated as needed, and evidence profiles were generated. Each subgroup generated a list of questions, searched for best available evidence, and then followed the principles of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system to assess the quality of evidence from high to very low, and to formulate recommendations as strong or weak, or best practice statement when applicable.

RESULTS: The Surviving Sepsis Guideline panel provided 93 statements on early management and resuscitation of patients with sepsis or septic shock. Overall, 32 were strong recommendations, 39 were weak recommendations, and 18 were best-practice statements. No recommendation was provided for four questions.

CONCLUSIONS: Substantial agreement exists among a large cohort of international experts regarding many strong recommendations for the best care of patients with sepsis. Although a significant number of aspects of care have relatively weak support, evidence-based recommendations regarding the acute management of sepsis and septic shock are the foundation of improved outcomes for these critically ill patients with high mortality.

Errataetall:

CommentIn: Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 11;52(1):. - PMID 29997181

Medienart:

E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:

2017

Erschienen:

2017

Enthalten in:

Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:43

Enthalten in:

Intensive care medicine - 43(2017), 3 vom: 19. März, Seite 304-377

Sprache:

Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:

Rhodes, Andrew [VerfasserIn]
Evans, Laura E [VerfasserIn]
Alhazzani, Waleed [VerfasserIn]
Levy, Mitchell M [VerfasserIn]
Antonelli, Massimo [VerfasserIn]
Ferrer, Ricard [VerfasserIn]
Kumar, Anand [VerfasserIn]
Sevransky, Jonathan E [VerfasserIn]
Sprung, Charles L [VerfasserIn]
Nunnally, Mark E [VerfasserIn]
Rochwerg, Bram [VerfasserIn]
Rubenfeld, Gordon D [VerfasserIn]
Angus, Derek C [VerfasserIn]
Annane, Djillali [VerfasserIn]
Beale, Richard J [VerfasserIn]
Bellinghan, Geoffrey J [VerfasserIn]
Bernard, Gordon R [VerfasserIn]
Chiche, Jean-Daniel [VerfasserIn]
Coopersmith, Craig [VerfasserIn]
De Backer, Daniel P [VerfasserIn]
French, Craig J [VerfasserIn]
Fujishima, Seitaro [VerfasserIn]
Gerlach, Herwig [VerfasserIn]
Hidalgo, Jorge Luis [VerfasserIn]
Hollenberg, Steven M [VerfasserIn]
Jones, Alan E [VerfasserIn]
Karnad, Dilip R [VerfasserIn]
Kleinpell, Ruth M [VerfasserIn]
Koh, Younsuk [VerfasserIn]
Lisboa, Thiago Costa [VerfasserIn]
Machado, Flavia R [VerfasserIn]
Marini, John J [VerfasserIn]
Marshall, John C [VerfasserIn]
Mazuski, John E [VerfasserIn]
McIntyre, Lauralyn A [VerfasserIn]
McLean, Anthony S [VerfasserIn]
Mehta, Sangeeta [VerfasserIn]
Moreno, Rui P [VerfasserIn]
Myburgh, John [VerfasserIn]
Navalesi, Paolo [VerfasserIn]
Nishida, Osamu [VerfasserIn]
Osborn, Tiffany M [VerfasserIn]
Perner, Anders [VerfasserIn]
Plunkett, Colleen M [VerfasserIn]
Ranieri, Marco [VerfasserIn]
Schorr, Christa A [VerfasserIn]
Seckel, Maureen A [VerfasserIn]
Seymour, Christopher W [VerfasserIn]
Shieh, Lisa [VerfasserIn]
Shukri, Khalid A [VerfasserIn]
Simpson, Steven Q [VerfasserIn]
Singer, Mervyn [VerfasserIn]
Thompson, B Taylor [VerfasserIn]
Townsend, Sean R [VerfasserIn]
Van der Poll, Thomas [VerfasserIn]
Vincent, Jean-Louis [VerfasserIn]
Wiersinga, W Joost [VerfasserIn]
Zimmerman, Janice L [VerfasserIn]
Dellinger, R Phillip [VerfasserIn]

Links:

Volltext

Themen:

9007-12-9
Anti-Bacterial Agents
Blood Glucose
Calcitonin
Consensus Development Conference
Evidence-based medicine
Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria
Guidelines
Infection
Journal Article
Practice Guideline
Sepsis
Sepsis bundles
Sepsis syndrome
Septic shock
Surviving Sepsis Campaign
Vasoconstrictor Agents

Anmerkungen:

Date Completed 21.07.2017

Date Revised 10.04.2022

published: Print-Electronic

CommentIn: Eur Respir J. 2018 Jul 11;52(1):. - PMID 29997181

Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:

10.1007/s00134-017-4683-6

funding:

Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):

NLM268136378