Final efficacy and updated safety results of the randomized phase III BEATRICE trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative early breast cancer
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissionsoup.com..
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the long-term impact of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
METHODS: Patients eligible for the open-label randomized phase III BEATRICE trial had centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive breast cancer (pT1a-pT3). Investigators selected anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy for each patient. After definitive surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy alone or with 1 year of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg/week equivalent). Stratification factors were nodal status, selected chemotherapy, hormone receptor status, and type of surgery. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; previously reported). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and safety.
RESULTS: After 56 months' median follow-up, 293 of 2591 randomized patients had died. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between treatment arms in either the total population (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.17; P = 0.52) or pre-specified subgroups. The 5-year OS rate was 88% (95% CI 86-90%) in both treatment arms. Updated IDFS results were consistent with the primary IDFS analysis. Five-year IDFS rates were 77% (95% CI 75-79%) with chemotherapy alone versus 80% (95% CI 77-82%) with bevacizumab. From 18 months after first study dose to study end, new grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 4.6% and 4.5% of patients in the two arms, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Final OS results showed no significant benefit from bevacizumab therapy for early TNBC. Late-onset toxicities were rare in both groups. Five-year OS and IDFS rates suggest that the prognosis for patients with TNBC is better than previously thought.
CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00528567.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):678-680. - PMID 28327956 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:28 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology - 28(2017), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 754-760 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Bell, R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
2S9ZZM9Q9V |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 02.05.2017 Date Revised 31.03.2022 published: Print ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00528567 CommentIn: Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):678-680. - PMID 28327956 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1093/annonc/mdw665 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM267282710 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM267282710 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224220335.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/annonc/mdw665 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0890.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM267282710 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)27993816 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Bell, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Final efficacy and updated safety results of the randomized phase III BEATRICE trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative early breast cancer |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 02.05.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 31.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00528567 | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: Ann Oncol. 2017 Apr 1;28(4):678-680. - PMID 28327956 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissionsoup.com. | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to assess the long-term impact of adding bevacizumab to adjuvant chemotherapy for early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Patients eligible for the open-label randomized phase III BEATRICE trial had centrally confirmed triple-negative operable primary invasive breast cancer (pT1a-pT3). Investigators selected anthracycline- and/or taxane-based chemotherapy for each patient. After definitive surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ≥4 cycles of chemotherapy alone or with 1 year of bevacizumab (5 mg/kg/week equivalent). Stratification factors were nodal status, selected chemotherapy, hormone receptor status, and type of surgery. The primary end point was invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; previously reported). Secondary outcome measures included overall survival (OS) and safety | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: After 56 months' median follow-up, 293 of 2591 randomized patients had died. There was no statistically significant difference in OS between treatment arms in either the total population (hazard ratio 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-1.17; P = 0.52) or pre-specified subgroups. The 5-year OS rate was 88% (95% CI 86-90%) in both treatment arms. Updated IDFS results were consistent with the primary IDFS analysis. Five-year IDFS rates were 77% (95% CI 75-79%) with chemotherapy alone versus 80% (95% CI 77-82%) with bevacizumab. From 18 months after first study dose to study end, new grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 4.6% and 4.5% of patients in the two arms, respectively | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Final OS results showed no significant benefit from bevacizumab therapy for early TNBC. Late-onset toxicities were rare in both groups. Five-year OS and IDFS rates suggest that the prognosis for patients with TNBC is better than previously thought | ||
520 | |a CLINICALTRIALS.GOV: NCT00528567 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial, Phase III | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a bevacizumab | |
650 | 4 | |a breast cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a chemotherapy | |
650 | 4 | |a survival | |
650 | 4 | |a triple negative | |
650 | 7 | |a Bevacizumab |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2S9ZZM9Q9V |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Brown, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Parmar, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Toi, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Suter, T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Steger, G G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pivot, X |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Mackey, J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jackisch, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dent, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hall, P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Xu, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Morales, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Provencher, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Hegg, R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vanlemmens, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Kirsch, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Schneeweiss, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Masuda, N |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Overkamp, F |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Cameron, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology |d 1990 |g 28(2017), 4 vom: 01. Apr., Seite 754-760 |w (DE-627)NLM012606308 |x 1569-8041 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:28 |g year:2017 |g number:4 |g day:01 |g month:04 |g pages:754-760 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw665 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 28 |j 2017 |e 4 |b 01 |c 04 |h 754-760 |