Characteristics of Differently Located Colorectal Cancers Support Proximal and Distal Classification : A Population-Based Study of 57,847 Patients
BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that colorectal cancer be regarded as several subgroups defined according to tumor location rather than as a single entity. The current study aimed to identify the most useful method for grouping colorectal cancer by tumor location according to both baseline and survival characteristics.
METHODS: Cases of pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2000 to 2012 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and categorized into three groups: right colon cancer (RCC), left colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer (ReC). Adjusted hazard ratios for known predictors of disease-specific survival (DSS) in colorectal cancer were obtained using a Cox proportional hazards regression model.
RESULTS: The study included 57847 patients: 43.5% with RCC, 37.7% with LCC, and 18.8% with ReC. Compared with LCC and ReC, RCC was more likely to affect old patients and women, and to be at advanced stage, poorly differentiated or un-differentiated, and mucinous. Patients with LCC or ReC had better DSS than those with RCC in subgroups including stage III or IV disease, age ≤70 years and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. Conversely, patients with LCC or ReC had worse DSS than those with RCC in subgroups including age ˃70 years and mucinous adenocarcinoma.
CONCLUSIONS: RCC differed from both LCC and ReC in several clinicopathologic characteristics and in DSS. It seems reasonable to group colorectal cancer into right-sided (i.e., proximal) and left-sided (i.e., distal) ones.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2016 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
PloS one - 11(2016), 12 vom: 09., Seite e0167540 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Yang, Jiao [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.07.2017 Date Revised 17.03.2022 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1371/journal.pone.0167540 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM266982174 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM266982174 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224215708.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1371/journal.pone.0167540 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0889.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM266982174 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)27936129 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Yang, Jiao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Characteristics of Differently Located Colorectal Cancers Support Proximal and Distal Classification |b A Population-Based Study of 57,847 Patients |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.07.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 17.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a BACKGROUND: It has been suggested that colorectal cancer be regarded as several subgroups defined according to tumor location rather than as a single entity. The current study aimed to identify the most useful method for grouping colorectal cancer by tumor location according to both baseline and survival characteristics | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Cases of pathologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma diagnosed from 2000 to 2012 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database and categorized into three groups: right colon cancer (RCC), left colon cancer (LCC), and rectal cancer (ReC). Adjusted hazard ratios for known predictors of disease-specific survival (DSS) in colorectal cancer were obtained using a Cox proportional hazards regression model | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: The study included 57847 patients: 43.5% with RCC, 37.7% with LCC, and 18.8% with ReC. Compared with LCC and ReC, RCC was more likely to affect old patients and women, and to be at advanced stage, poorly differentiated or un-differentiated, and mucinous. Patients with LCC or ReC had better DSS than those with RCC in subgroups including stage III or IV disease, age ≤70 years and non-mucinous adenocarcinoma. Conversely, patients with LCC or ReC had worse DSS than those with RCC in subgroups including age ˃70 years and mucinous adenocarcinoma | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: RCC differed from both LCC and ReC in several clinicopathologic characteristics and in DSS. It seems reasonable to group colorectal cancer into right-sided (i.e., proximal) and left-sided (i.e., distal) ones | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
700 | 1 | |a Du, Xiang Lin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Shu Ting |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Bi Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wu, Yin Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Chen, Zhe Ling |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lv, Meng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Shen, Yan Wei |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Xin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dong, Dan Feng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, Dan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Wang, Fan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Li, En Xiao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yi, Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Yang, Jin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t PloS one |d 2006 |g 11(2016), 12 vom: 09., Seite e0167540 |w (DE-627)NLM167327399 |x 1932-6203 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2016 |g number:12 |g day:09 |g pages:e0167540 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0167540 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2016 |e 12 |b 09 |h e0167540 |