Effect of sample treatment on biomechanical properties of insect cuticle
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
Experimental limitations often prevent to perform biomechanical measurements on fresh arthropod cuticle samples. Hence, in many cases short- or long-term storage of samples is required. So far, it is not known whether any of the standard lab-techniques commonly used to fix or store insect cuticle samples in any way affects the biomechanical properties of the respective samples. In this paper we systematically address this question for the first time, with a focus on practical, easily accessible and common lab-methods including storage in water, ethanol, glutaraldehyde, freezing and desiccation. We performed a comprehensive and sensitive non-destructive Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) on locust hind leg tibiae using a three-point-bending setup. Our results show that from all tested treatments, freezing samples at -20 °C was the best option to maintain the original values for Young's modulus and damping properties of insect cuticle. In addition, our results indicate that the damping properties of locust hind legs might be mechanically optimized in respect to the jumping and kicking direction.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2017 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2017 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:46 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Arthropod structure & development - 46(2017), 1 vom: 06. Jan., Seite 138-146 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Aberle, Benjamin [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
059QF0KO0R |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.03.2017 Date Revised 14.03.2017 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.asd.2016.08.001 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM263166880 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM263166880 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224203313.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.asd.2016.08.001 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0877.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM263166880 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)27495946 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1467-8039(16)30112-8 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Aberle, Benjamin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of sample treatment on biomechanical properties of insect cuticle |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 14.03.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 14.03.2017 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a Experimental limitations often prevent to perform biomechanical measurements on fresh arthropod cuticle samples. Hence, in many cases short- or long-term storage of samples is required. So far, it is not known whether any of the standard lab-techniques commonly used to fix or store insect cuticle samples in any way affects the biomechanical properties of the respective samples. In this paper we systematically address this question for the first time, with a focus on practical, easily accessible and common lab-methods including storage in water, ethanol, glutaraldehyde, freezing and desiccation. We performed a comprehensive and sensitive non-destructive Dynamic Mechanical Analysis (DMA) on locust hind leg tibiae using a three-point-bending setup. Our results show that from all tested treatments, freezing samples at -20 °C was the best option to maintain the original values for Young's modulus and damping properties of insect cuticle. In addition, our results indicate that the damping properties of locust hind legs might be mechanically optimized in respect to the jumping and kicking direction | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Biomechanics | |
650 | 4 | |a Dynamic mechanical analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Insect cuticle | |
650 | 4 | |a Sample treatment | |
650 | 7 | |a Insect Proteins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a cuticle proteins, insects |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Water |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 059QF0KO0R |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ethanol |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 3K9958V90M |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Glutaral |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a T3C89M417N |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Jemmali, Raouf |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dirks, Jan-Henning |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Arthropod structure & development |d 2000 |g 46(2017), 1 vom: 06. Jan., Seite 138-146 |w (DE-627)NLM175835160 |x 1873-5495 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:46 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g day:06 |g month:01 |g pages:138-146 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.asd.2016.08.001 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 46 |j 2017 |e 1 |b 06 |c 01 |h 138-146 |