Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program is well recognized in surgical quality measurement and is used widely in research. Recent calls to make it a platform for national public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives highlight the importance of understanding which types of hospitals elect to participate in the program. Our objective was to compare characteristics of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to characteristics of nonparticipating US hospitals.
METHODS: The 2013 American Hospital Association and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information System datasets were used to compare characteristics and operating margins of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to those of nonparticipating hospitals.
RESULTS: Of 3,872 general medical and surgical hospitals performing inpatient surgery in the United States, 475 (12.3%) participated in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Participating hospitals performed 29.0% of all operations in the United States. Compared with nonparticipating hospitals, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals had a higher mean annual inpatient surgical case volume (6,426 vs 1,874; P < .001) and a larger mean number of hospital beds (420 vs 167; P < .001); participating hospitals were more often teaching hospitals (35.2% vs 4.1%; P < .001), had more quality-related accreditations (P < .001), and had higher mean operating margins (P < .05). States with the highest proportions of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program had established surgical quality improvement collaboratives.
CONCLUSION: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals are large teaching hospitals with more quality-related accreditations and financial resources. These findings should be considered when reviewing research studies using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, and the findings reinforce that efforts are needed to facilitate participation in surgical quality improvement by all hospital types.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:160 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Surgery - 160(2016), 5 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 1182-1188 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Sheils, Catherine R [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 30.06.2017 Date Revised 10.12.2019 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.034 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM261395688 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM261395688 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224195449.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.034 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0871.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM261395688 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)27302100 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0039-6060(16)30126-X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Sheils, Catherine R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Evaluation of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 30.06.2017 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 10.12.2019 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program is well recognized in surgical quality measurement and is used widely in research. Recent calls to make it a platform for national public reporting and pay-for-performance initiatives highlight the importance of understanding which types of hospitals elect to participate in the program. Our objective was to compare characteristics of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to characteristics of nonparticipating US hospitals | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: The 2013 American Hospital Association and Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Healthcare Cost Report Information System datasets were used to compare characteristics and operating margins of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to those of nonparticipating hospitals | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Of 3,872 general medical and surgical hospitals performing inpatient surgery in the United States, 475 (12.3%) participated in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Participating hospitals performed 29.0% of all operations in the United States. Compared with nonparticipating hospitals, American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals had a higher mean annual inpatient surgical case volume (6,426 vs 1,874; P < .001) and a larger mean number of hospital beds (420 vs 167; P < .001); participating hospitals were more often teaching hospitals (35.2% vs 4.1%; P < .001), had more quality-related accreditations (P < .001), and had higher mean operating margins (P < .05). States with the highest proportions of hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program had established surgical quality improvement collaboratives | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program hospitals are large teaching hospitals with more quality-related accreditations and financial resources. These findings should be considered when reviewing research studies using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data, and the findings reinforce that efforts are needed to facilitate participation in surgical quality improvement by all hospital types | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Evaluation Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dahlke, Allison R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kreutzer, Lindsey |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bilimoria, Karl Y |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yang, Anthony D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Surgery |d 1945 |g 160(2016), 5 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 1182-1188 |w (DE-627)NLM000023590 |x 1532-7361 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:160 |g year:2016 |g number:5 |g day:15 |g month:11 |g pages:1182-1188 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2016.04.034 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 160 |j 2016 |e 5 |b 15 |c 11 |h 1182-1188 | ||