The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of "implant" fractures after knee arthroplasty using clinical literature and worldwide arthroplasty registers. The hypothesis was that register datasets report higher rates of these rare complications than clinical studies.
METHODS: Calculations were based on the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of knee arthroplasties, comparing clinical studies published in MEDLINE-listed journals and annual reports from worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardized methodology.
RESULTS: Twelve clinical studies and datasets from six worldwide registers were included. Rates of fractures of knee arthroplasties were reported from 0.2 to 2.5 % in clinical studies versus 0.02-0.17 % in worldwide arthroplasty registers.
CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of knee arthroplasty systems are rare complications, with clinical studies showing higher incidence rates than worldwide arthroplasty registries. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implanted before 2000, constrained primary or revision constrained total knee arthroplasties, and patellar replacements showed the highest incidence of implant fracture. The results of this analysis can help clinicians to counsel patients on potential complications following knee arthroplasty.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2016 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA - 24(2016), 10 vom: 19. Okt., Seite 3272-3279 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gilg, Magdalena M [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Themen: |
Arthroplasty |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.04.2017 Date Revised 02.12.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM260111767 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM260111767 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224192703.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0867.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM260111767 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)27154281 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gilg, Magdalena M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 4 | |a The incidence of implant fractures after knee arthroplasty |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 20.04.2017 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of "implant" fractures after knee arthroplasty using clinical literature and worldwide arthroplasty registers. The hypothesis was that register datasets report higher rates of these rare complications than clinical studies | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Calculations were based on the pooled incidence of revision operations after fractures of knee arthroplasties, comparing clinical studies published in MEDLINE-listed journals and annual reports from worldwide arthroplasty registers in a structured literature analysis based on a standardized methodology | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Twelve clinical studies and datasets from six worldwide registers were included. Rates of fractures of knee arthroplasties were reported from 0.2 to 2.5 % in clinical studies versus 0.02-0.17 % in worldwide arthroplasty registers | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of knee arthroplasty systems are rare complications, with clinical studies showing higher incidence rates than worldwide arthroplasty registries. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) implanted before 2000, constrained primary or revision constrained total knee arthroplasties, and patellar replacements showed the highest incidence of implant fracture. The results of this analysis can help clinicians to counsel patients on potential complications following knee arthroplasty | ||
520 | |a LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Arthroplasty | |
650 | 4 | |a Breakage | |
650 | 4 | |a Fracture | |
650 | 4 | |a Implant | |
650 | 4 | |a Knee | |
650 | 4 | |a Replacement | |
650 | 4 | |a TKA | |
650 | 4 | |a TKR | |
700 | 1 | |a Zeller, Christian W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Leitner, Lukas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Leithner, Andreas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Labek, Gerold |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Sadoghi, Patrick |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA |d 1997 |g 24(2016), 10 vom: 19. Okt., Seite 3272-3279 |w (DE-627)NLM075292165 |x 1433-7347 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2016 |g number:10 |g day:19 |g month:10 |g pages:3272-3279 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2016 |e 10 |b 19 |c 10 |h 3272-3279 |