Controversies in Lung Cancer Screening
Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved..
There remains an extensive debate over lung cancer screening, with lobbying for and against screening for very compelling reasons. The National Lung Screening Trial, International Early Lung Cancer Program, and other major screening studies favor screening with low-dose CT scans and have shown a reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality. The increasing incidence of lung cancer and the dismal survival rate for advanced disease despite improved multimodality therapy have sparked an interest in the implementation of national lung cancer screening. Concerns over imaging workflow, radiation dose, management of small nodules, overdiagnosis bias, lead-time and length-time bias, emerging new technologies, and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated. The authors address each of these issues as they relate to radiologic practice.
Errataetall: |
ReprintOf: J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):931-6. - PMID 24295943 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2016 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR - 13(2016), 2 Suppl vom: 04. Feb., Seite R2-7 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Gill, Ritu R [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
CT scan |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 03.06.2016 Date Revised 05.02.2016 published: Print ReprintOf: J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):931-6. - PMID 24295943 Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.005 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM257183329 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM257183329 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224182247.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.005 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0857.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM257183329 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)26846531 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S1546-1440(15)01361-7 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Gill, Ritu R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Controversies in Lung Cancer Screening |
264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 03.06.2016 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 05.02.2016 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a ReprintOf: J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Dec;10(12):931-6. - PMID 24295943 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2013 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a There remains an extensive debate over lung cancer screening, with lobbying for and against screening for very compelling reasons. The National Lung Screening Trial, International Early Lung Cancer Program, and other major screening studies favor screening with low-dose CT scans and have shown a reduction in lung cancer-specific mortality. The increasing incidence of lung cancer and the dismal survival rate for advanced disease despite improved multimodality therapy have sparked an interest in the implementation of national lung cancer screening. Concerns over imaging workflow, radiation dose, management of small nodules, overdiagnosis bias, lead-time and length-time bias, emerging new technologies, and cost-effectiveness continue to be debated. The authors address each of these issues as they relate to radiologic practice | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a CT scan | |
650 | 4 | |a Lung cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a low-dose CT | |
650 | 4 | |a lung cancer screening | |
650 | 4 | |a overdiagnosis bias | |
650 | 4 | |a tumor volume doubling time | |
700 | 1 | |a Jaklitsch, Michael T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Jacobson, Francine L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR |d 2004 |g 13(2016), 2 Suppl vom: 04. Feb., Seite R2-7 |w (DE-627)NLM167902083 |x 1558-349X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2016 |g number:2 Suppl |g day:04 |g month:02 |g pages:R2-7 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.12.005 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 13 |j 2016 |e 2 Suppl |b 04 |c 02 |h R2-7 |