Effective adverse event reduction with bolus-basal versus sliding scale insulin therapy in patients with diabetes during conventional hospitalization : Systematic review and meta-analysis
Copyright © 2015 SEEN. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved..
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness to reduce clinical adverse events and safety of insulin administered in basal-bolus-corrector or basal-corrector regimens (BB) versus a sliding scale scheme (SS) in patients with diabetes or newly diagnosed hyperglycemia admitted to a conventional (not critical) medical or surgical hospital ward.
METHOD: A Medline search was conducted. The Odds ratio was the main summary measure. A random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used.
RESULTS: A total of 957 citations were collected, of which nine were finally included in the systematic review. Patients in the BB group had better blood glucose control than those with SS. Overall, there was a nonsignificant trend to a lower risk of adverse events in the BB as compared to the SS group (OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.04], [I(2)=71%]). There was a nonsignificant trend to an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the BB group (OR 2.29 [95% CI 0.50 to 10.49] [I(2)=70%]).
CONCLUSION: Despite its benefit for glycemic control during hospitalization, this review did not show that use of the BB scheme decreases clinical events in patients hospitalized in a conventional ward. Because of heterogeneity of the results, we think that clinical trials are needed addressing its effect in patient subgroups in which the BB scheme may be used safely and with longer follow-up periods.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2016 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2016 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:63 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Endocrinologia y nutricion : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion - 63(2016), 4 vom: 17. Apr., Seite 145-56 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Gómez Cuervo, Covadonga [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Diabetes |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.10.2017 Date Revised 02.12.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.endonu.2015.11.008 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM256992517 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM256992517 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224181843.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.endonu.2015.11.008 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0856.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM256992517 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)26826772 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S1575-0922(15)00356-3 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Gómez Cuervo, Covadonga |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effective adverse event reduction with bolus-basal versus sliding scale insulin therapy in patients with diabetes during conventional hospitalization |b Systematic review and meta-analysis |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 09.10.2017 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 02.12.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2015 SEEN. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a INTRODUCTION: The aim of this review was to assess the effectiveness to reduce clinical adverse events and safety of insulin administered in basal-bolus-corrector or basal-corrector regimens (BB) versus a sliding scale scheme (SS) in patients with diabetes or newly diagnosed hyperglycemia admitted to a conventional (not critical) medical or surgical hospital ward | ||
| 520 | |a METHOD: A Medline search was conducted. The Odds ratio was the main summary measure. A random effects model with the Mantel-Haenszel procedure was used | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 957 citations were collected, of which nine were finally included in the systematic review. Patients in the BB group had better blood glucose control than those with SS. Overall, there was a nonsignificant trend to a lower risk of adverse events in the BB as compared to the SS group (OR 0.67 [95% CI 0.22 to 2.04], [I(2)=71%]). There was a nonsignificant trend to an increased risk of hypoglycemia in the BB group (OR 2.29 [95% CI 0.50 to 10.49] [I(2)=70%]) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Despite its benefit for glycemic control during hospitalization, this review did not show that use of the BB scheme decreases clinical events in patients hospitalized in a conventional ward. Because of heterogeneity of the results, we think that clinical trials are needed addressing its effect in patient subgroups in which the BB scheme may be used safely and with longer follow-up periods | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Diabetes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Hospital medicine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Medicina hospitalaria | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Metaanálisis | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Hypoglycemic Agents |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Insulin |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sánchez Morla, Ana |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pérez-Jacoiste Asín, María Asunción |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bisbal Pardo, Otilia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pérez Ordoño, Luis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Vila Santos, Juan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Endocrinologia y nutricion : organo de la Sociedad Espanola de Endocrinologia y Nutricion |d 2008 |g 63(2016), 4 vom: 17. Apr., Seite 145-56 |w (DE-627)NLM190192887 |x 1579-2021 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:63 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g day:17 |g month:04 |g pages:145-56 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.endonu.2015.11.008 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 63 |j 2016 |e 4 |b 17 |c 04 |h 145-56 | ||