A review of the classification of Dupuytren's disease
© The Author(s) 2014..
Although much has been published about the treatment of Dupuytren's disease, there is no clear consensus regarding the most effective form of treatment. Part of this uncertainty may result from the absence of a universal method of assessing this condition. We undertook a review of the literature in order to summarize the various methods by which Dupuytren's disease has been measured and quantified. We included all articles that offered a classification or assessment system for the disease. We excluded articles that dealt solely with surgical technique (although inevitably there was some overlap). We conclude that there are many methods of assessment, but that none of them is perfect and that further work is needed in the field.
Errataetall: |
CommentIn: J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Jun;40(5):544. - PMID 26002706 |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2015 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2015 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:40 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
The Journal of hand surgery, European volume - 40(2015), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 155-65 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Akhavani, M A [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
Assessment |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 15.10.2015 Date Revised 27.01.2015 published: Print CommentIn: J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Jun;40(5):544. - PMID 26002706 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1177/1753193414560511 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM245632670 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM245632670 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224141310.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/1753193414560511 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0818.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM245632670 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)25618867 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Akhavani, M A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 2 | |a A review of the classification of Dupuytren's disease |
264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 15.10.2015 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 27.01.2015 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Jun;40(5):544. - PMID 26002706 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a © The Author(s) 2014. | ||
520 | |a Although much has been published about the treatment of Dupuytren's disease, there is no clear consensus regarding the most effective form of treatment. Part of this uncertainty may result from the absence of a universal method of assessing this condition. We undertook a review of the literature in order to summarize the various methods by which Dupuytren's disease has been measured and quantified. We included all articles that offered a classification or assessment system for the disease. We excluded articles that dealt solely with surgical technique (although inevitably there was some overlap). We conclude that there are many methods of assessment, but that none of them is perfect and that further work is needed in the field | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Dupuytren’s disease | |
650 | 4 | |a assessment | |
650 | 4 | |a classification | |
650 | 4 | |a scoring | |
700 | 1 | |a McMurtrie, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Webb, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Muir, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of hand surgery, European volume |d 2007 |g 40(2015), 2 vom: 01. Feb., Seite 155-65 |w (DE-627)NLM165273615 |x 2043-6289 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:40 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g day:01 |g month:02 |g pages:155-65 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1753193414560511 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 40 |j 2015 |e 2 |b 01 |c 02 |h 155-65 |