Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients undergone esophagectomy
OBJECT: Sevoflurane and propofol are both widely used in clinical anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients receiving esophagectomy.
METHODS: Forty adult patients undergoing an elective open-chest thoracotomy for esophagectomy were randomized to receive either propofol (n=20) or sevoflurane (n=20) as the main anesthetic agent. The study was performed in Changzheng Hospital. Hemodynamic data were recorded at specific intervals: before the surgery (T0), BIS values reaching 40 after anesthesia induction (T1), two-lung ventilation (T2), ten minutes after one-lung ventilation (T3), the end of the operation (T4) using PiCCO2 and Swan-Ganz catheter.
RESULTS: CI, RVEF, RVSWI and RVEDVI were significantly smaller in propofol group than those in sevoflurane group throughout the surgery (P<0.05). However, SVRI was significantly greater in propofol group than that in sevoflurane group (P<0.05). Compared with the patients in propofol group, the patients who received sevoflurane had a greater reduction in OI and increase in Os/Ot (P<0.05). And, PVRI was significantly smaller in sevoflurane group than in propofol group (P<0.05).
CONCLUSION: Anesthesia with sevoflurane preserved better right ventricular function than propofol in patients receiving esophagectomy. However, propofol improved oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia. To have the best effect, anesthesiologists can choose the two anesthetics flexibly according to the monitoring results.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2014 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2014 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:7 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of clinical and experimental pathology - 7(2014), 1 vom: 02., Seite 272-9 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Xu, Wen-Yun [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.09.2014 Date Revised 21.10.2021 published: Electronic-eCollection Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM234508167 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM234508167 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224101422.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0781.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM234508167 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)24427348 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Xu, Wen-Yun |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients undergone esophagectomy |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 05.09.2014 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 21.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic-eCollection | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECT: Sevoflurane and propofol are both widely used in clinical anesthesia. The aim of this study is to compare the effects of sevoflurane and propofol on right ventricular function and pulmonary circulation in patients receiving esophagectomy | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Forty adult patients undergoing an elective open-chest thoracotomy for esophagectomy were randomized to receive either propofol (n=20) or sevoflurane (n=20) as the main anesthetic agent. The study was performed in Changzheng Hospital. Hemodynamic data were recorded at specific intervals: before the surgery (T0), BIS values reaching 40 after anesthesia induction (T1), two-lung ventilation (T2), ten minutes after one-lung ventilation (T3), the end of the operation (T4) using PiCCO2 and Swan-Ganz catheter | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: CI, RVEF, RVSWI and RVEDVI were significantly smaller in propofol group than those in sevoflurane group throughout the surgery (P<0.05). However, SVRI was significantly greater in propofol group than that in sevoflurane group (P<0.05). Compared with the patients in propofol group, the patients who received sevoflurane had a greater reduction in OI and increase in Os/Ot (P<0.05). And, PVRI was significantly smaller in sevoflurane group than in propofol group (P<0.05) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: Anesthesia with sevoflurane preserved better right ventricular function than propofol in patients receiving esophagectomy. However, propofol improved oxygenation and shunt fraction during one-lung ventilation compared with sevoflurane anesthesia. To have the best effect, anesthesiologists can choose the two anesthetics flexibly according to the monitoring results | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Sevoflurane | |
| 650 | 4 | |a esophagectomy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a propofol | |
| 650 | 4 | |a pulmonary circulation | |
| 650 | 4 | |a right ventricular function | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Methyl Ethers |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Sevoflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 38LVP0K73A |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Propofol |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a YI7VU623SF |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wang, Na |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Xu, Hai-Tao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Yuan, Hong-Bin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sun, Hai-Jing |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Dun, Chun-Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zhou, Shuang-Qiong |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Zou, Zui |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Shi, Xue-Yin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of clinical and experimental pathology |d 2008 |g 7(2014), 1 vom: 02., Seite 272-9 |w (DE-627)NLM182361349 |x 1936-2625 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2014 |g number:1 |g day:02 |g pages:272-9 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2014 |e 1 |b 02 |h 272-9 | ||