Peer review guidance : how do you write a good review?
Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1918-1920. - PMID 32815029 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2013 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2013 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:113 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association - 113(2013), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 916-20 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Allen, Thomas Wesley [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.09.2014 Date Revised 28.11.2013 published: Print CommentIn: Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1918-1920. - PMID 32815029 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM233153349 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM233153349 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224094515.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0777.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM233153349 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)24285034 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Allen, Thomas Wesley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Peer review guidance |b how do you write a good review? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 16.09.2014 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 28.11.2013 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Intensive Care Med. 2020 Oct;46(10):1918-1920. - PMID 32815029 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association |d 1945 |g 113(2013), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 916-20 |w (DE-627)NLM000005711 |x 1945-1997 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:113 |g year:2013 |g number:12 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:916-20 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 113 |j 2013 |e 12 |b 01 |c 12 |h 916-20 | ||