Caseload as a factor for outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage : a systematic review and meta-analysis
OBJECT: Increasing evidence exists that treatment of complex medical conditions in high-volume centers is found to improve outcome. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), a complex disease, probably also benefit from treatment at a high-volume center. The authors aimed to determine, based on published literature, whether a higher hospital caseload is associated with improved outcomes of patients undergoing treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage.
METHODS: The authors identified studies from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 28, 2012, that evaluated outcome in high-volume versus low-volume centers in patients with SAH who were treated by either clipping or endovascular coiling. No language restrictions were set. The compared outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Mortality in studies was pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Study quality was reported according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria.
RESULTS: Four articles were included in this analysis, representing 36,600 patients. The quality of studies was graded low in 3 and very low in 1. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed a decrease in hospital mortality (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.60-0.97]; p = 0.00; I(2) = 91%) in high-volume hospitals treating SAH patients. Sensitivity analysis revealed the relative weight of the 1 low-quality study. Removal of the study with very low quality increased the effect size of the meta-analysis to an OR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.56-0.84; p = 0.00; I(2) = 86%). The definition of hospital volume differed among studies. Cutoffs and dichotomizations were used as well as division in quartiles. In 1 study, low volume was defined as 9 or fewer patients yearly, whereas in another it was defined as fewer than 30 patients yearly. Similarly, 1 study defined high volume as more than 20 patients annually, and another defined it as more than 50 patients a year. For comparability between studies, recalculation was done with dichotomized data if available. Cross et al., 2003 (low volume ≤ 18, high volume ≥ 19) and Johnston, 2000 (low volume ≤ 31, high volume ≥ 32) provided core data for recalculation. The overall results of this analysis revealed an OR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.99; p = 0.00; I(2) = 87%).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the shortcomings of this study, the mortality rate was lower in hospitals with a larger caseload. Limitations of the meta-analysis are the not uniform cutoff values and uncertainty about case mix.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2014 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2014 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:120 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of neurosurgery - 120(2014), 3 vom: 04. März, Seite 605-11 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Boogaarts, Hieronymus D [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 12.05.2014 Date Revised 16.03.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.3171/2013.9.JNS13640 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM23140185X |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM23140185X | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224090637.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3171/2013.9.JNS13640 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0771.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM23140185X | ||
035 | |a (NLM)24093633 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Boogaarts, Hieronymus D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Caseload as a factor for outcome in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage |b a systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 12.05.2014 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 16.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECT: Increasing evidence exists that treatment of complex medical conditions in high-volume centers is found to improve outcome. Patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), a complex disease, probably also benefit from treatment at a high-volume center. The authors aimed to determine, based on published literature, whether a higher hospital caseload is associated with improved outcomes of patients undergoing treatment after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage | ||
520 | |a METHODS: The authors identified studies from MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to September 28, 2012, that evaluated outcome in high-volume versus low-volume centers in patients with SAH who were treated by either clipping or endovascular coiling. No language restrictions were set. The compared outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. Mortality in studies was pooled in a random effects meta-analysis. Study quality was reported according to the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) criteria | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Four articles were included in this analysis, representing 36,600 patients. The quality of studies was graded low in 3 and very low in 1. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed a decrease in hospital mortality (OR 0.77 [95% CI 0.60-0.97]; p = 0.00; I(2) = 91%) in high-volume hospitals treating SAH patients. Sensitivity analysis revealed the relative weight of the 1 low-quality study. Removal of the study with very low quality increased the effect size of the meta-analysis to an OR of 0.68 (95% CI 0.56-0.84; p = 0.00; I(2) = 86%). The definition of hospital volume differed among studies. Cutoffs and dichotomizations were used as well as division in quartiles. In 1 study, low volume was defined as 9 or fewer patients yearly, whereas in another it was defined as fewer than 30 patients yearly. Similarly, 1 study defined high volume as more than 20 patients annually, and another defined it as more than 50 patients a year. For comparability between studies, recalculation was done with dichotomized data if available. Cross et al., 2003 (low volume ≤ 18, high volume ≥ 19) and Johnston, 2000 (low volume ≤ 31, high volume ≥ 32) provided core data for recalculation. The overall results of this analysis revealed an OR of 0.85 (95% CI 0.72-0.99; p = 0.00; I(2) = 87%) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Despite the shortcomings of this study, the mortality rate was lower in hospitals with a larger caseload. Limitations of the meta-analysis are the not uniform cutoff values and uncertainty about case mix | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-Analysis | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
650 | 4 | |a Systematic Review | |
700 | 1 | |a van Amerongen, Martinus J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a de Vries, Joost |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Westert, Gert P |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Verbeek, André L M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Grotenhuis, J André |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bartels, Ronald H M A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of neurosurgery |d 1945 |g 120(2014), 3 vom: 04. März, Seite 605-11 |w (DE-627)NLM000006254 |x 1933-0693 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:120 |g year:2014 |g number:3 |g day:04 |g month:03 |g pages:605-11 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.3171/2013.9.JNS13640 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 120 |j 2014 |e 3 |b 04 |c 03 |h 605-11 |