Pull-out bond strength of a fibre-reinforced composite post system luted with self-adhesive resin cements
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: Due to morphological differences along the root canal, serious structural damage, or extensive endodontic preparation, cement thickness of luted fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) post systems can largely vary. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of a self-etch (Multilink Automix, MLA) and various self-adhesive resin cements (G-Cem, GCM; Maxcem Elite, MXE; RelyX Unicem, RLX; SmartCem 2, SMC) on the pull-out bond strengths of FRC posts to root canal dentine, and to compare the effects of different cementation thicknesses.
METHODS: 100 bovine incisor roots were embedded in acrylic resin and randomly assigned to two groups. Root canals of group 1 were prepared with RelyX Fiber Post drill size one (Ø 1.3mm), whereas in group 2 drill size three (Ø 1.9mm) was used to attain different cement thicknesses (thicknesses 1 and 2). Each group was then subdivided into five subgroups (n=10). RelyX Fiber Posts size one (Ø 0.70mm) were luted with the respective resin cements. All specimens were subjected to pull-out evaluation using a universal testing machine. Post surface areas covered with cement were measured by means of stereomicroscopy.
RESULTS: RLX revealed the significantly highest pull-out bond strengths in both groups (p<0.05), while MXE exhibited the significantly lowest pull-out bond strengths in group 2 (p<0.05). Main failure modes were determined as adhesive at the cement-post surface for all examined groups (except for SMC, group 2).
CONCLUSIONS: The different resin cements influenced the pull-out bond strengths, whereas the cement thickness itself was not responsible for any differences.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Self-adhesive resin cements can provide an acceptable retention of FRC posts even in case of use with wider post space conditions.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2013 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2013 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of dentistry - 41(2013), 11 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 1020-6 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Nova, Vassiliki [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 16.10.2015 Date Revised 17.03.2022 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.011 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM230610552 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM230610552 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231224084821.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.011 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0768.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM230610552 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)24007789 | ||
| 035 | |a (PII)S0300-5712(13)00215-7 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Nova, Vassiliki |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Pull-out bond strength of a fibre-reinforced composite post system luted with self-adhesive resin cements |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 16.10.2015 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 17.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVES: Due to morphological differences along the root canal, serious structural damage, or extensive endodontic preparation, cement thickness of luted fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) post systems can largely vary. This study aimed at evaluating the effects of a self-etch (Multilink Automix, MLA) and various self-adhesive resin cements (G-Cem, GCM; Maxcem Elite, MXE; RelyX Unicem, RLX; SmartCem 2, SMC) on the pull-out bond strengths of FRC posts to root canal dentine, and to compare the effects of different cementation thicknesses | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: 100 bovine incisor roots were embedded in acrylic resin and randomly assigned to two groups. Root canals of group 1 were prepared with RelyX Fiber Post drill size one (Ø 1.3mm), whereas in group 2 drill size three (Ø 1.9mm) was used to attain different cement thicknesses (thicknesses 1 and 2). Each group was then subdivided into five subgroups (n=10). RelyX Fiber Posts size one (Ø 0.70mm) were luted with the respective resin cements. All specimens were subjected to pull-out evaluation using a universal testing machine. Post surface areas covered with cement were measured by means of stereomicroscopy | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: RLX revealed the significantly highest pull-out bond strengths in both groups (p<0.05), while MXE exhibited the significantly lowest pull-out bond strengths in group 2 (p<0.05). Main failure modes were determined as adhesive at the cement-post surface for all examined groups (except for SMC, group 2) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The different resin cements influenced the pull-out bond strengths, whereas the cement thickness itself was not responsible for any differences | ||
| 520 | |a CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Self-adhesive resin cements can provide an acceptable retention of FRC posts even in case of use with wider post space conditions | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Cement thickness | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fibre post | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Pull-out test | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-adhesive cement | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Self-etch cement | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Composite Resins |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Dental Materials |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a G-Cem resin cement |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Maxcem |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Methacrylates |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Polyurethanes |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Rely X Unicem |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Resin Cements |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a fiberglass |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a multilink adhesive system |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a urethane dimethacrylate luting resin |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 125523-74-2 |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Karygianni, Lamprini |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Altenburger, Markus J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wolkewitz, Martin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Kielbassa, Andrej M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Wrbas, Karl-Thomas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of dentistry |d 1972 |g 41(2013), 11 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 1020-6 |w (DE-627)NLM000213578 |x 1879-176X |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2013 |g number:11 |g day:15 |g month:11 |g pages:1020-6 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.08.011 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 41 |j 2013 |e 11 |b 15 |c 11 |h 1020-6 | ||