Effect of double dose oseltamivir on clinical and virological outcomes in children and adults admitted to hospital with severe influenza : double blind randomised controlled trial
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of recommendations in treatment guidelines to use higher than approved doses of oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza.
DESIGN: Double blind randomised trial.
SETTING: Thirteen hospitals in Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam.
PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 1 year admitted to hospital with confirmed severe influenza.
INTERVENTIONS: Oral oseltamivir at double dose (150 mg twice a day/paediatric equivalent) versus standard dose (75 mg twice a day/paediatric equivalent).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Viral status according to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for influenza RNA in nasal and throat swabs on day five.
RESULTS: Of 326 patients (including 246 (75.5%) children aged <15), 165 and 161 were randomised to double or standard dose oseltamivir, respectively. Of these, 260 (79.8%) were infected with influenza virus A (133 (40.8%) with A/H3N2, 72 (22.1%) with A/H1N1-pdm09, 38 (11.7%) with seasonal A/H1N1, 17 (5.2%) with A/H5N1) and 53 (16.2%) with influenza virus B. A further 3.9% (13) were false positive by rapid antigen test (negative by RT-PCR and no rise in convalescent haemagglutination inhibition titers). Similar proportions of patients were negative for RT-PCR on day five of treatment: 115/159 (72.3%, 95% confidence interval 64.9% to 78.7%) double dose recipients versus 105/154 (68.2%, 60.5% to 75.0%) standard dose recipients; difference 4.2% (-5.9 to 14.2); P=0.42. No differences were found in clearance of virus in subgroup analyses by virus type/subtype, age, and duration of illness before randomisation. Mortality was similar: 12/165 (7.3%, 4.2% to 12.3%) in double dose recipients versus 9/161 (5.6%, 3.0% to 10.3%) in standard dose recipients. No differences were found between double and standard dose arms in median days on supplemental oxygen (3 (interquartile range 2-5) v 3.5 (2-7)), in intensive care (4.5 (3-6) v 5 (2-11), and on mechanical ventilation (2.5 (1-16) v 8 (1-16)), respectively. No important differences in tolerability were found.
CONCLUSIONS: There were no virological or clinical advantages with double dose oseltamivir compared with standard dose in patients with severe influenza admitted to hospital.
REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00298233.
Errataetall: | |
---|---|
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2013 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2013 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:346 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMJ (Clinical research ed.) - 346(2013) vom: 30. Mai, Seite f3039 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
South East Asia Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
20O93L6F9H |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 06.08.2013 Date Revised 21.10.2021 published: Electronic ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00298233 CommentIn: BMJ. 2013;346:f3449. - PMID 23723458 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1136/bmj.f3039 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM227938526 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM227938526 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224074802.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1136/bmj.f3039 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0759.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM227938526 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)23723457 | ||
035 | |a (PII)bmj.f3039 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a South East Asia Infectious Disease Clinical Research Network |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of double dose oseltamivir on clinical and virological outcomes in children and adults admitted to hospital with severe influenza |b double blind randomised controlled trial |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 06.08.2013 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 21.10.2021 | ||
500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00298233 | ||
500 | |a CommentIn: BMJ. 2013;346:f3449. - PMID 23723458 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVE: To investigate the validity of recommendations in treatment guidelines to use higher than approved doses of oseltamivir in patients with severe influenza | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: Double blind randomised trial | ||
520 | |a SETTING: Thirteen hospitals in Indonesia, Singapore, Thailand, and Vietnam | ||
520 | |a PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 1 year admitted to hospital with confirmed severe influenza | ||
520 | |a INTERVENTIONS: Oral oseltamivir at double dose (150 mg twice a day/paediatric equivalent) versus standard dose (75 mg twice a day/paediatric equivalent) | ||
520 | |a MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Viral status according to reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for influenza RNA in nasal and throat swabs on day five | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Of 326 patients (including 246 (75.5%) children aged <15), 165 and 161 were randomised to double or standard dose oseltamivir, respectively. Of these, 260 (79.8%) were infected with influenza virus A (133 (40.8%) with A/H3N2, 72 (22.1%) with A/H1N1-pdm09, 38 (11.7%) with seasonal A/H1N1, 17 (5.2%) with A/H5N1) and 53 (16.2%) with influenza virus B. A further 3.9% (13) were false positive by rapid antigen test (negative by RT-PCR and no rise in convalescent haemagglutination inhibition titers). Similar proportions of patients were negative for RT-PCR on day five of treatment: 115/159 (72.3%, 95% confidence interval 64.9% to 78.7%) double dose recipients versus 105/154 (68.2%, 60.5% to 75.0%) standard dose recipients; difference 4.2% (-5.9 to 14.2); P=0.42. No differences were found in clearance of virus in subgroup analyses by virus type/subtype, age, and duration of illness before randomisation. Mortality was similar: 12/165 (7.3%, 4.2% to 12.3%) in double dose recipients versus 9/161 (5.6%, 3.0% to 10.3%) in standard dose recipients. No differences were found between double and standard dose arms in median days on supplemental oxygen (3 (interquartile range 2-5) v 3.5 (2-7)), in intensive care (4.5 (3-6) v 5 (2-11), and on mechanical ventilation (2.5 (1-16) v 8 (1-16)), respectively. No important differences in tolerability were found | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: There were no virological or clinical advantages with double dose oseltamivir compared with standard dose in patients with severe influenza admitted to hospital | ||
520 | |a REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00298233 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 7 | |a Antiviral Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Oseltamivir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 20O93L6F9H |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Sedyaningsih, Endang Rahayu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Malik, Moh Suhud |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Setiawaty, Vivi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Trihono, Trihono |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Burhan, Erlina |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Aditama, Tjandra Yoga |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Soepandi, Prijanti Z |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Partakusuma, Lia G |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sutiyoso, Agung P |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Priatni, Ika |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bandung, Rumah Sakit Hasan Sadikan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Jusuf, Hadi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Pranggono, Emmy Hermiyanti |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Soeroto, Arto Yuwono |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Setiabudi, Djatnika |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Somasetia, Dadang Hudaya |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sudarwati, Sri |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Maskoen, Tini T |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hartantri, Yovita |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Parwati, Ida |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Giriputro, Sardikin |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Murniati, Dewi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sirait, Sondang Maryutka |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Soetanto, Tony |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sulastri, Sri |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Agus, Rismali |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rusli, Adria |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wiweka, Sila |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wignall, Steve |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Baird, Kevin |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Safika, Iko |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sangsajja, Chariya |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Manosuthi, Weerawat |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sutha, Patama |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chuchottaworn, Chareon |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Sansayunh, Piamlarp |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bangpattanasiri, Kittima |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Taylor, Walter R J |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Stepniewska, Kasia |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fukuda, Caroline |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lindegardh, Niklas |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a White, Nicholas |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Day, Nick |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chotpitayasunondh, Tawee |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Suntarattiwong, Piyarat |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chantbuddhiwet, Umaporn |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Netsawang, Supichaya |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chokephaibulkit, Kulkanya |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vanprapar, Nirun |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Prasitsuebsai, Wasana |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Wittawatmongkol, Orasri |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Anekthananon, Thanomsak |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ratanasuwan, Winai |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Rongrungruang, Yong |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Puthavathana, Pilaipan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tambyah, Paul A |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Leo, Yee-Sin |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Fisher, Dale |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Chai, Louis |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lee, Lawrence |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Lin, Raymond |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Minh, Ngo Ngoc Quang |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Khanh, Truong Huu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thoa, Le Phan Kim |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tuan, Le Anh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thi, Tran My Dung |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ha, Lam Thi Thuy |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Qui, Le Minh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thinh, Le Quoc |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Anh, Nguyen Ngoc Tu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tuan, Tran Anh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Nhien, Trinh Hong |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Phuong, Bui Pham |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Qui, Phan Tu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thy, Tieu Chau |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Vu, Bui Xuan |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tinh, Le Binh Bao |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thanh, Dang Thi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Khanh, Vo Phuong |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Viet, Do Chau |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thuy, Tran Thi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Bao, Vo Quoc |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Trung, Le Nguyen Nhat |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thoa, Ho Thi Kim |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Anh, Tran Thi Ngoc |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Loan, Tran Thi Thu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Huong, Tran Quynh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Le, Nguyen Thi Hanh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Viet, Ho Lu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tuan, Ha Manh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Ha, Nguyen Van Vinh Chau |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Truong, Nguyen Thanh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Thao, Le Thi Thu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Phong, Nguyen Thanh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Hien, Pham Tran Dieu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Men, Pham Thi Hai |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Tam, Cao Thi |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Diet, Tran Vinh |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Qui, Phan Tu |e investigator |4 oth | |
700 | 1 | |a Van Hao, Nguyen |e investigator |4 oth | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t BMJ (Clinical research ed.) |d 1988 |g 346(2013) vom: 30. Mai, Seite f3039 |w (DE-627)NLM012612685 |x 1756-1833 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:346 |g year:2013 |g day:30 |g month:05 |g pages:f3039 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f3039 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 346 |j 2013 |b 30 |c 05 |h f3039 |