Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel?
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the modification of composite-to-enamel bond strength by pre-treatment of enamel with a concentrated, acidic SnCl2-solution.
METHODS: Six groups of flat human enamel specimens (n=44 per group) were treated as follows: OB-H: H3PO4 etching, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive; manufacturer's instructions); OB-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive); OB-HS: H3PO4 etching+SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive); CF-N: Clearfil SE application (primer+bond; manufacturer's instructions); CF-H: H3PO4 etching, Clearfil SE application (primer+bond); CF-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Clearfil SE application (primer+bond). Enamel specimens were then built up with resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) and stored (100% humidity, 37 °C, 1 week). μTBS-measurement and failure mode analysis of one-half of the specimens were performed immediately after storage, while the other half was analysed after a thermocycling procedure (8500 cycles; 5 °C and 55 °C; dwell time 30s). Additional specimens were prepared for SEM- and EDX-analysis.
RESULTS: Highest values were measured for OB-H before and after thermocycling, lowest values for CF-N. Compared to OB-H treatment, OB-S treatment reduced μTBS before/after thermocycling by 23%/28% and OB-HS treatment by 8%/24% (except for OB-SH before (n.s.), all p≤0.001 compared to OB-H). In the Clearfil SE treated groups pre-treatment increased μTBS significantly compared to CF-N (before/after: CF-H: +46%/+70%; CF-S: +51%/42%; all p≤0.001).
CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with H3PO4 or SnCl2 markedly increased the μTBS of Clearfil SE to enamel. However, thermocycling partly reduced the gain in μTBS obtained by SnCl2 pre-treatment.
CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of an acidic and highly concentrated SnCl2 solution is a good option to increase the μTBS between enamel and a resin composite mediated by an adhesive system containing the multifunctional monomer MDP.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2013 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2013 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:41 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of dentistry - 41(2013), 7 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 642-52 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Schlueter, Nadine [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Themen: |
1BQV3749L5 |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 04.07.2014 Date Revised 24.06.2013 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM226604969 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM226604969 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224071811.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0755.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM226604969 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)23578471 | ||
035 | |a (PII)S0300-5712(13)00089-4 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Schlueter, Nadine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does tin pre-treatment enhance the bond strength of adhesive systems to enamel? |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 04.07.2014 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 24.06.2013 | ||
500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. | ||
520 | |a OBJECTIVES: The study investigated the modification of composite-to-enamel bond strength by pre-treatment of enamel with a concentrated, acidic SnCl2-solution | ||
520 | |a METHODS: Six groups of flat human enamel specimens (n=44 per group) were treated as follows: OB-H: H3PO4 etching, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive; manufacturer's instructions); OB-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive); OB-HS: H3PO4 etching+SnCl2 pre-treatment, Optibond FL application (primer+adhesive); CF-N: Clearfil SE application (primer+bond; manufacturer's instructions); CF-H: H3PO4 etching, Clearfil SE application (primer+bond); CF-S: SnCl2 pre-treatment, Clearfil SE application (primer+bond). Enamel specimens were then built up with resin composite (Clearfil Majesty Esthetic) and stored (100% humidity, 37 °C, 1 week). μTBS-measurement and failure mode analysis of one-half of the specimens were performed immediately after storage, while the other half was analysed after a thermocycling procedure (8500 cycles; 5 °C and 55 °C; dwell time 30s). Additional specimens were prepared for SEM- and EDX-analysis | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: Highest values were measured for OB-H before and after thermocycling, lowest values for CF-N. Compared to OB-H treatment, OB-S treatment reduced μTBS before/after thermocycling by 23%/28% and OB-HS treatment by 8%/24% (except for OB-SH before (n.s.), all p≤0.001 compared to OB-H). In the Clearfil SE treated groups pre-treatment increased μTBS significantly compared to CF-N (before/after: CF-H: +46%/+70%; CF-S: +51%/42%; all p≤0.001) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSION: Pre-treatment with H3PO4 or SnCl2 markedly increased the μTBS of Clearfil SE to enamel. However, thermocycling partly reduced the gain in μTBS obtained by SnCl2 pre-treatment | ||
520 | |a CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The application of an acidic and highly concentrated SnCl2 solution is a good option to increase the μTBS between enamel and a resin composite mediated by an adhesive system containing the multifunctional monomer MDP | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 7 | |a Clearfil SE Bond |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Composite Resins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a OptiBond FL |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Phosphoric Acids |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Resin Cements |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tin Compounds |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a clearfil majesty |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a stannous chloride |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 1BQV3749L5 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a phosphoric acid |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a E4GA8884NN |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Peutzfeldt, Anne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ganss, Carolina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lussi, Adrian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of dentistry |d 1972 |g 41(2013), 7 vom: 01. Juli, Seite 642-52 |w (DE-627)NLM000213578 |x 1879-176X |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:41 |g year:2013 |g number:7 |g day:01 |g month:07 |g pages:642-52 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.009 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 41 |j 2013 |e 7 |b 01 |c 07 |h 642-52 |