Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects : the progress study, 48-week results
PURPOSE: Current antiretroviral regimens recommended for treatment-naïve patients include 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a new NRTI-sparing regimen may provide an alternative for persons for whom traditional regimens may not be the best option.
METHODS: PROGRESS is a 96-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and an integrase inhibitor (lopi-navir/ritonavir [LPV/r] + raltegravir [RAL]) to a boosted PI and 2 NRTIs (LPV/r + tenofovir/ emtricitabine [TDF/FTC]) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-1-infected adults.
RESULTS: A total of 206 subjects were randomized to receive LPV/r + RAL (n=101) or LPV/r + TDF/FTC (n=105) and analyzed for ARV efficacy using the US Food and Drug Administration time to loss of virologic response (FDA-TLOVR) algorithm. The percentage of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at week 48 was 83.2% in the LPV/r + RAL group and 84.8% in the LPV/r + TDF/FTC group (P = .850; difference -1.6%; exact 95% CI, -12.0% to 8.8%). As the lower limit of the exact 95% CI for the difference between regimens was at or above the protocol-defined threshold of -20% (as well as the more stringent threshold of -12%), LPV/r + RAL was noninferior to LPV/r + TDF/FTC. The occurrence of treatment-related, moderate/severe adverse events was similar between treatment groups through 48 weeks of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: The HIV treatment regimen of LPV/r + RAL resulted in noninferior efficacy and comparable safety and tolerability compared with a traditional NRTI-containing regimen through 48 weeks of treatment. These results support further evaluation of the LPV/r + RAL regimen.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2011 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2011 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:12 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
HIV clinical trials - 12(2011), 5 vom: 03. Sept., Seite 255-67 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Reynes, Jacques [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 26.01.2012 Date Revised 19.11.2015 published: Print ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00711009 Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
doi: |
10.1310/hct1205-255 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM213959720 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM213959720 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231224022627.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 231224s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1310/hct1205-255 |2 doi | |
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0713.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM213959720 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)22180523 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Reynes, Jacques |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Examination of noninferiority, safety, and tolerability of lopinavir/ritonavir and raltegravir compared with lopinavir/ritonavir and tenofovir/ emtricitabine in antiretroviral-naïve subjects |b the progress study, 48-week results |
264 | 1 | |c 2011 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 26.01.2012 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 19.11.2015 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00711009 | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a PURPOSE: Current antiretroviral regimens recommended for treatment-naïve patients include 2 nucleoside/nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether a new NRTI-sparing regimen may provide an alternative for persons for whom traditional regimens may not be the best option | ||
520 | |a METHODS: PROGRESS is a 96-week, randomized, open-label, multicenter trial comparing the efficacy and safety of a boosted protease inhibitor (PI) and an integrase inhibitor (lopi-navir/ritonavir [LPV/r] + raltegravir [RAL]) to a boosted PI and 2 NRTIs (LPV/r + tenofovir/ emtricitabine [TDF/FTC]) in antiretroviral (ARV)-naïve HIV-1-infected adults | ||
520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 206 subjects were randomized to receive LPV/r + RAL (n=101) or LPV/r + TDF/FTC (n=105) and analyzed for ARV efficacy using the US Food and Drug Administration time to loss of virologic response (FDA-TLOVR) algorithm. The percentage of subjects with plasma HIV-1 RNA <40 copies/mL at week 48 was 83.2% in the LPV/r + RAL group and 84.8% in the LPV/r + TDF/FTC group (P = .850; difference -1.6%; exact 95% CI, -12.0% to 8.8%). As the lower limit of the exact 95% CI for the difference between regimens was at or above the protocol-defined threshold of -20% (as well as the more stringent threshold of -12%), LPV/r + RAL was noninferior to LPV/r + TDF/FTC. The occurrence of treatment-related, moderate/severe adverse events was similar between treatment groups through 48 weeks of treatment | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The HIV treatment regimen of LPV/r + RAL resulted in noninferior efficacy and comparable safety and tolerability compared with a traditional NRTI-containing regimen through 48 weeks of treatment. These results support further evaluation of the LPV/r + RAL regimen | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-HIV Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a HIV Integrase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a HIV Protease Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Organophosphonates |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyrrolidinones |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a RNA, Viral |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Deoxycytidine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 0W860991D6 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Lopinavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2494G1JF75 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Raltegravir Potassium |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 43Y000U234 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tenofovir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 99YXE507IL |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Emtricitabine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a G70B4ETF4S |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Adenine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a JAC85A2161 |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ritonavir |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a O3J8G9O825 |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Lawal, Adebayo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pulido, Federico |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Soto-Malave, Ruth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gathe, Joseph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Tian, Min |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Fredrick, Linda M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Podsadecki, Thomas J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Nilius, Angela M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t HIV clinical trials |d 2000 |g 12(2011), 5 vom: 03. Sept., Seite 255-67 |w (DE-627)NLM114850178 |x 1528-4336 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:12 |g year:2011 |g number:5 |g day:03 |g month:09 |g pages:255-67 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1310/hct1205-255 |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 12 |j 2011 |e 5 |b 03 |c 09 |h 255-67 |