Public acceptance as a determinant of management strategies for bovine tuberculosis in free-ranging U.S. wildlife

Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier B.V..

When bovine tuberculosis (bTB) is detected in free-ranging wildlife populations, preventing geographic spread and the establishment of a wildlife reservoir requires rapid, often aggressive response. Public tolerance can exert a significant effect on potential control measures available to managers, and thus on the success of disease management efforts. Separate outbreaks of bTB in free-ranging white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) in two midwestern states provide a case study. In Minnesota, bTB was first discovered in cattle in 2005 and subsequently in deer. To date, 12 beef cattle farms and 26 white-tailed deer have been found infected with the disease. From 2005 to 2008, disease prevalence in deer has decreased from 0.4% (SE=0.2%) to <0.1% and remained confined to a small (<425 km(2)) geographic area. Deer population reduction through liberalized hunting and targeted culling by ground sharpshooting and aerial gunning, combined with a prohibition on baiting and recreational feeding, have likely been major drivers preventing disease spread thus far. Without support from cattle producers, deer hunters and the general public, as well as politicians, implementation of these aggressive strategies by state and federal authorities would not have been possible. In contrast, Michigan first discovered bovine bTB in free-ranging deer in 1975, and disease management efforts were not instituted until 1995. The first infected cattle herd was diagnosed in 1998. Since 1995, disease prevalence in free-ranging deer has decreased from 4.9% to 1.8% in the ∼ 1500 km(2) core outbreak area. Culture positive deer have been found as far as 188 km from the core area. Liberalized harvest and restrictions on baiting and feeding have facilitated substantial reductions in prevalence. However, there has been little support on the part of hunters, farmers or the general public for more aggressive population reduction measures such as culling, and compliance with baiting and feeding restrictions has been variable and often problematic. We compare and contrast the Minnesota and Michigan outbreaks with respect to temporal, social, economic, and logistical factors that shape public attitudes toward aggressive disease control strategies, the limitations these factors place on management, and the implications for bTB eradication from wildlife reservoirs in the U.S.

Medienart:	E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:	2011
Erschienen:	2011

Enthalten in:	Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:151
Enthalten in:	Veterinary microbiology - 151(2011), 1-2 vom: 05. Juli, Seite 200-4

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:	Carstensen, Michelle [VerfasserIn] O'Brien, Daniel J [VerfasserIn] Schmitt, Stephen M [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext

Themen:	Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Anmerkungen:	Date Completed 16.09.2011 Date Revised 01.12.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE

doi:	10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.02.046

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	NLM206973586