Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera
PURPOSE: To compare the results obtained by two screening techniques for diabetic retinopathy.
METHODS: Patients were assessed in two groups, according to whether the retinal images were analyzed by the general practitioner (Group 1) or by the ophthalmologist (Group 2) in a two-year prospective study using telemedicine.
RESULTS: The number of patients referred to the nonmydriatic fundus camera unit was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (63.80% versus 17.63%). Greater patient adherence was observed in Group 1 than in Group 2 when patients came to retinography (98.25% versus 87.52%). There were no significant differences in other technique variables. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was similar in both groups (8.98% in Group 1 and 9.16% in Group 2), but the prevalence of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy was higher in Group 2 (1.69% [severe] and 0.45% [proliferative]) than in Group 1 (1.01% and 0.11%, respectively). Diabetic macular edema was more prevalent in Group 2 (2.03%).
CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of general practitioners in the screening method seems to be important. A great number of patients with diabetes mellitus were screened, and a higher percentage of patients with diabetic retinopathy or macular edema were detected.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2010 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:4 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) - 4(2010) vom: 08. Dez., Seite 1481-8 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Romero-Aroca, Pedro [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Diabetes mellitus |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 14.07.2011 Date Revised 20.10.2021 published: Electronic Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.2147/OPTH.S14521 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM20466103X |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM20466103X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231223232444.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.2147/OPTH.S14521 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0682.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM20466103X | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)21191444 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Romero-Aroca, Pedro |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Prospective comparison of two methods of screening for diabetic retinopathy by nonmydriatic fundus camera |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 14.07.2011 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 20.10.2021 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a PURPOSE: To compare the results obtained by two screening techniques for diabetic retinopathy | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: Patients were assessed in two groups, according to whether the retinal images were analyzed by the general practitioner (Group 1) or by the ophthalmologist (Group 2) in a two-year prospective study using telemedicine | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: The number of patients referred to the nonmydriatic fundus camera unit was higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (63.80% versus 17.63%). Greater patient adherence was observed in Group 1 than in Group 2 when patients came to retinography (98.25% versus 87.52%). There were no significant differences in other technique variables. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was similar in both groups (8.98% in Group 1 and 9.16% in Group 2), but the prevalence of severe proliferative diabetic retinopathy was higher in Group 2 (1.69% [severe] and 0.45% [proliferative]) than in Group 1 (1.01% and 0.11%, respectively). Diabetic macular edema was more prevalent in Group 2 (2.03%) | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: The inclusion of general practitioners in the screening method seems to be important. A great number of patients with diabetes mellitus were screened, and a higher percentage of patients with diabetic retinopathy or macular edema were detected | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a diabetes mellitus | |
| 650 | 4 | |a diabetic macular edema | |
| 650 | 4 | |a diabetic retinopathy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a epidemiology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a nonmydriatic fundus camera | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Sagarra-Alamo, Ramon |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Basora-Gallisa, Josep |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Basora-Gallisa, Teresa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Baget-Bernaldiz, Marc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Bautista-Perez, Angel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) |d 2007 |g 4(2010) vom: 08. Dez., Seite 1481-8 |w (DE-627)NLM186998104 |x 1177-5467 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2010 |g day:08 |g month:12 |g pages:1481-8 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S14521 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 4 |j 2010 |b 08 |c 12 |h 1481-8 | ||