Consensus terminology for stages of care : acute, chronic, recurrent, and wellness
Copyright 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved..
OBJECTIVE: As the chiropractic profession delineates its role in the emerging health care marketplace, it will become increasingly important that the scope of appropriate chiropractic care is clearly defined relative to overall patient case management. Therefore, the Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters engaged in a multidisciplinary consensus process addressing the terminology related to "levels of care.".
METHODS: A formal consensus process was conducted in early 2009, following the RAND/UCLA method for rating appropriateness. Panelists were selected to provide a broad representation of the profession in terms of geographic location and organizational affiliation, and an attempt was made to include members of other professions, including representation from third-party payors. The Delphi process was conducted electronically in January-February 2009. A nominal group panel was conducted through an online meeting service using an experienced group facilitator. Twenty-seven panelists were selected; all but 3 were doctors of chiropractic. Six of the panelists had experience as consultants with third-party payors.
RESULTS: Fifteen seed statements were circulated to the Delphi panel. Consensus was reached on all statements after 3 Delphi rounds, with further refinements made through the nominal group panel.
CONCLUSIONS: By using a recognized formal consensus process, the Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters has endeavored to establish a set of terms that are acceptable to the chiropractic community in order to facilitate their use within the broader health care community.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2010 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2010 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics - 33(2010), 6 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 458-63 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Dehen, Mark D [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
Journal Article |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 07.12.2010 Date Revised 31.03.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.06.007 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM200525360 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM200525360 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231223220734.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231223s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.06.007 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0668.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM200525360 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)20732583 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dehen, Mark D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Consensus terminology for stages of care |b acute, chronic, recurrent, and wellness |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2010 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 07.12.2010 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 31.03.2022 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Copyright 2010 National University of Health Sciences. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. | ||
| 520 | |a OBJECTIVE: As the chiropractic profession delineates its role in the emerging health care marketplace, it will become increasingly important that the scope of appropriate chiropractic care is clearly defined relative to overall patient case management. Therefore, the Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters engaged in a multidisciplinary consensus process addressing the terminology related to "levels of care." | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A formal consensus process was conducted in early 2009, following the RAND/UCLA method for rating appropriateness. Panelists were selected to provide a broad representation of the profession in terms of geographic location and organizational affiliation, and an attempt was made to include members of other professions, including representation from third-party payors. The Delphi process was conducted electronically in January-February 2009. A nominal group panel was conducted through an online meeting service using an experienced group facilitator. Twenty-seven panelists were selected; all but 3 were doctors of chiropractic. Six of the panelists had experience as consultants with third-party payors | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: Fifteen seed statements were circulated to the Delphi panel. Consensus was reached on all statements after 3 Delphi rounds, with further refinements made through the nominal group panel | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: By using a recognized formal consensus process, the Council on Chiropractic Guidelines and Practice Parameters has endeavored to establish a set of terms that are acceptable to the chiropractic community in order to facilitate their use within the broader health care community | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Practice Guideline | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Whalen, Wayne M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Farabaugh, Ronald J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Hawk, Cheryl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of manipulative and physiological therapeutics |d 1993 |g 33(2010), 6 vom: 08. Juli, Seite 458-63 |w (DE-627)NLM012834084 |x 1532-6586 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2010 |g number:6 |g day:08 |g month:07 |g pages:458-63 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2010.06.007 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 33 |j 2010 |e 6 |b 08 |c 07 |h 458-63 | ||