Assessing the comparative effectiveness of a diagnostic technology : CT colonography
Medical imaging is a prime example of an innovation that has brought important advances to medical care while triggering concerns about potential overuse and excessive costs. Many hopes are riding on comparative effectiveness research to help guide better decision making to improve quality and value. But the dynamic nature of medical imaging poses challenges for the traditional paradigms of evidentiary review and analysis at the heart of comparative effectiveness. This paper discusses these challenges and presents policy lessons for manufacturers, evidence reviewers, and decisionmakers, illustrated by an assessment of a prominent emerging imaging technique: computed tomography (CT) colonography.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2008 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2008 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:27 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Health affairs (Project Hope) - 27(2008), 6 vom: 12. Nov., Seite 1503-14 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Pearson, Steven D [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 20.02.2009 Date Revised 10.11.2008 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1503 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM184381207 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM184381207 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231223170527.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231223s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1503 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0615.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM184381207 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)18997205 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Pearson, Steven D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Assessing the comparative effectiveness of a diagnostic technology |b CT colonography |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 20.02.2009 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 10.11.2008 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a Medical imaging is a prime example of an innovation that has brought important advances to medical care while triggering concerns about potential overuse and excessive costs. Many hopes are riding on comparative effectiveness research to help guide better decision making to improve quality and value. But the dynamic nature of medical imaging poses challenges for the traditional paradigms of evidentiary review and analysis at the heart of comparative effectiveness. This paper discusses these challenges and presents policy lessons for manufacturers, evidence reviewers, and decisionmakers, illustrated by an assessment of a prominent emerging imaging technique: computed tomography (CT) colonography | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Knudsen, Amy B |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Scherer, Roberta W |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Weissberg, Jed |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gazelle, G Scott |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Health affairs (Project Hope) |d 1981 |g 27(2008), 6 vom: 12. Nov., Seite 1503-14 |w (DE-627)NLM012834297 |x 1544-5208 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:27 |g year:2008 |g number:6 |g day:12 |g month:11 |g pages:1503-14 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.6.1503 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 27 |j 2008 |e 6 |b 12 |c 11 |h 1503-14 | ||