Effect of nitrous oxide on desflurane MACBAR at two target-controlled concentrations of remifentanil
BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the effect of nitrous oxide on the desflurane requirement for blunting sympathetic response following surgical incision (MACBAR) when desflurane was combined with two different target-controlled concentrations of remifentanil (1 and 3 ng/mL).
METHODS: A total of 103 patients, aged 20-50 years, ASA physical status I, scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for elective abdominal surgery, were randomly allocated to receive anesthesia with desflurane alone (Group A, n = 53), or with the addition of 60% nitrous oxide (Group N, n = 50). Patients of both groups were further assigned to receive a target-controlled plasma concentration of 1 ng/mL (Group A1, n = 27; Group N1, n = 26) or 3 ng/mL remifentanil (Group A3, n = 26, Group N3, n = 24). Sympathetic responses to surgical incision were determined after a 20 min period of constant end-tidal desflurane and target-controlled remifentanil concentrations. Predetermined end-tidal desflurane concentrations and the MACBAR for each group were determined using an up-and-down sequential allocation technique.
RESULTS: A total of 98 patients completed the study. The MACBAR of desflurane was 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI95: 4.9-5.5%]) in Group A1 and 2.7% (CI95: 2.6-2.8%) in Group N1 (P<0.001), while in Groups A3 and N3 the MACBAR of desflurane was 2.2% (CI95:2-2.4%) and 2% (CI95:1.9-2.2%), respectively (P<0.01). When considering a minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) value with a contribution of 60% nitrous oxide (0.55 MAC) in this population, the combined MACBAR values (expressed as multiples of the MAC) were 1.9 MAC for group A1, 1 MAC for group N1, 0.8 MAC for group A3, and 0.7 MAC for group N3.
CONCLUSION: The addition of 60% nitrous oxide reduces the MACBAR of desflurane by 52% when using a remifentanil concentration of 1 ng/mL, and reduces the MACBAR by 10% when using a remifentanil concentration of 3 ng/mL.
| Errataetall: |
CommentIn: Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):97. - PMID 19039301 |
|---|---|
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2008 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2008 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:74 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Minerva anestesiologica - 74(2008), 5 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 165-72 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Dedola, E [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.08.2008 Date Revised 01.12.2018 published: Print CommentIn: Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):97. - PMID 19039301 Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM178946249 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM178946249 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231223152942.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231223s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0597.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM178946249 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)18414359 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dedola, E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Effect of nitrous oxide on desflurane MACBAR at two target-controlled concentrations of remifentanil |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 19.08.2008 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 01.12.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a CommentIn: Minerva Anestesiol. 2009 Jan-Feb;75(1-2):97. - PMID 19039301 | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a BACKGROUND: The aim of this prospective, randomized, double-blind study was to determine the effect of nitrous oxide on the desflurane requirement for blunting sympathetic response following surgical incision (MACBAR) when desflurane was combined with two different target-controlled concentrations of remifentanil (1 and 3 ng/mL) | ||
| 520 | |a METHODS: A total of 103 patients, aged 20-50 years, ASA physical status I, scheduled to undergo general anesthesia for elective abdominal surgery, were randomly allocated to receive anesthesia with desflurane alone (Group A, n = 53), or with the addition of 60% nitrous oxide (Group N, n = 50). Patients of both groups were further assigned to receive a target-controlled plasma concentration of 1 ng/mL (Group A1, n = 27; Group N1, n = 26) or 3 ng/mL remifentanil (Group A3, n = 26, Group N3, n = 24). Sympathetic responses to surgical incision were determined after a 20 min period of constant end-tidal desflurane and target-controlled remifentanil concentrations. Predetermined end-tidal desflurane concentrations and the MACBAR for each group were determined using an up-and-down sequential allocation technique | ||
| 520 | |a RESULTS: A total of 98 patients completed the study. The MACBAR of desflurane was 5.2% (95% confidence interval [CI95: 4.9-5.5%]) in Group A1 and 2.7% (CI95: 2.6-2.8%) in Group N1 (P<0.001), while in Groups A3 and N3 the MACBAR of desflurane was 2.2% (CI95:2-2.4%) and 2% (CI95:1.9-2.2%), respectively (P<0.01). When considering a minimum anesthetic concentration (MAC) value with a contribution of 60% nitrous oxide (0.55 MAC) in this population, the combined MACBAR values (expressed as multiples of the MAC) were 1.9 MAC for group A1, 1 MAC for group N1, 0.8 MAC for group A3, and 0.7 MAC for group N3 | ||
| 520 | |a CONCLUSION: The addition of 60% nitrous oxide reduces the MACBAR of desflurane by 52% when using a remifentanil concentration of 1 ng/mL, and reduces the MACBAR by 10% when using a remifentanil concentration of 3 ng/mL | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Inhalation |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Anesthetics, Intravenous |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Piperidines |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Desflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CRS35BZ94Q |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Isoflurane |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a CYS9AKD70P |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Nitrous Oxide |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a K50XQU1029 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Remifentanil |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a P10582JYYK |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Albertin, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Poli, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a La Colla, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gandolfi, A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Martani, C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Torri, G |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Minerva anestesiologica |d 1953 |g 74(2008), 5 vom: 07. Mai, Seite 165-72 |w (DE-627)NLM000043397 |x 1827-1596 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:74 |g year:2008 |g number:5 |g day:07 |g month:05 |g pages:165-72 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 74 |j 2008 |e 5 |b 07 |c 05 |h 165-72 | ||