Postural control at the human wrist
In our movements and posture, we always act against a physical load. A key property of any load is its elastic stiffness (K), which describes how the force required to hold it must change with position. Here we examine how load stiffness affects the ability to maintain a stable posture at the wrist. Loads having positive (like a spring) and negative stiffness (like an inverted pendulum) were created by varying the position of weights on multiarm rigid pendulum. Subjects (n = 9) held 15 loads (K = +/- 0.04, +/- 0.01 and 0 N m deg(-1) at mean torques of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 N m) still for 60 s. Residual wrist movement (sway) increased with mean torque and increased as stiffness became more negative. Large effects of load stiffness were seen at low frequencies (< 1.5 Hz) but not at higher frequencies that reflect load resonance and reflex activity. Subjects accurately perceived their postural sway while holding the loads but measured psychophysical thresholds showed that load stiffness was not perceived. We conclude that load stiffness, independent of force levels, affects the ability to control a load and that the postural control process relies on perception and volitional tracking rather than more automatic reflex pathways. Despite an awareness of their postural errors, we see no evidence for adaptation of postural control processes to compensate for changes in load properties. This is unlike the adaptation of feedforward control processes that produce targeted volitional movements when load properties are altered. We propose that postural control and movement control are fundamentally different neural processes.
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2008 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2008 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:586 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
The Journal of physiology - 586(2008), 5 vom: 01. März, Seite 1265-75 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chew, John Z Z [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
|---|
| Themen: |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 05.06.2008 Date Revised 13.11.2018 published: Print-Electronic Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1113/jphysiol.2007.146910 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM176790365 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM176790365 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231223144813.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 231223s2008 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1113/jphysiol.2007.146910 |2 doi | |
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0589.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM176790365 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)18187473 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Chew, John Z Z |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Postural control at the human wrist |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2008 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ƒaComputermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a ƒa Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 05.06.2008 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 13.11.2018 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print-Electronic | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a In our movements and posture, we always act against a physical load. A key property of any load is its elastic stiffness (K), which describes how the force required to hold it must change with position. Here we examine how load stiffness affects the ability to maintain a stable posture at the wrist. Loads having positive (like a spring) and negative stiffness (like an inverted pendulum) were created by varying the position of weights on multiarm rigid pendulum. Subjects (n = 9) held 15 loads (K = +/- 0.04, +/- 0.01 and 0 N m deg(-1) at mean torques of 0.2, 0.4 and 0.6 N m) still for 60 s. Residual wrist movement (sway) increased with mean torque and increased as stiffness became more negative. Large effects of load stiffness were seen at low frequencies (< 1.5 Hz) but not at higher frequencies that reflect load resonance and reflex activity. Subjects accurately perceived their postural sway while holding the loads but measured psychophysical thresholds showed that load stiffness was not perceived. We conclude that load stiffness, independent of force levels, affects the ability to control a load and that the postural control process relies on perception and volitional tracking rather than more automatic reflex pathways. Despite an awareness of their postural errors, we see no evidence for adaptation of postural control processes to compensate for changes in load properties. This is unlike the adaptation of feedforward control processes that produce targeted volitional movements when load properties are altered. We propose that postural control and movement control are fundamentally different neural processes | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Gandevia, Simon C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Fitzpatrick, Richard C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Journal of physiology |d 1878 |g 586(2008), 5 vom: 01. März, Seite 1265-75 |w (DE-627)NLM000006513 |x 1469-7793 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:586 |g year:2008 |g number:5 |g day:01 |g month:03 |g pages:1265-75 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2007.146910 |3 Volltext |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 586 |j 2008 |e 5 |b 01 |c 03 |h 1265-75 | ||