Perception and quality of life associated with the use of olopatadine 0.2% (Pataday) in patients with active allergic conjunctivitis
This 28-d, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical study was designed to evaluate perceptions of olopatadine 0.2% in patients with active ocular allergic signs and symptoms. The study enrolled 330 patients, 5 to 94 y of age, who had previously used olopatadine 0.1% for active allergic conjunctivitis. Most patients were white (n=230; 70.1%) and female (n=239; 72.9%). Of all enrolled patients, 328 were evaluable for analysis. Throughout the study, patients instilled 1 drop of olopatadine 0.2% into each eye once daily; adverse events were documented and ocular evaluations were conducted to ensure patient safety. Direct evaluations of efficacy were not performed. On days 1 and 7, patients completed the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, recorded their perceptions of olopatadine 0.1% (day 1) or 0.2% (day 7), and had their ocular allergies assessed globally. On each of the first 6 d of treatment, patients also completed a telephone-based perception questionnaire. On day 28, patients returned to the study center, reported their treatment perceptions, had their ocular allergies assessed, and exited the trial. Overall, patients had a positive perception of olopatadine 0.2%. Patients were more satisfied with olopatadine 0.2% than they remembered being with olopatadine 0.1% (289 vs 257 patients; 87.6% vs 77.8%; P<.05). The majority of the 48 patients who wore contact lenses (n=42; 88%) believed that they could wear their contacts as desired. Significant improvement was noted in all categories of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (P<.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported. Patients perceived olopatadine 0.2% to be effective and well tolerated.
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2007 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2007 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Advances in therapy - 24(2007), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 1221-32 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Scoper, Stephen V [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Themen: |
2XG66W44KF |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 09.04.2008 Date Revised 17.03.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM176583726 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM176583726 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231223144348.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 231223s2007 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0589.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM176583726 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)18165204 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Scoper, Stephen V |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perception and quality of life associated with the use of olopatadine 0.2% (Pataday) in patients with active allergic conjunctivitis |
264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 09.04.2008 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 17.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a This 28-d, open-label, multicenter, single-arm clinical study was designed to evaluate perceptions of olopatadine 0.2% in patients with active ocular allergic signs and symptoms. The study enrolled 330 patients, 5 to 94 y of age, who had previously used olopatadine 0.1% for active allergic conjunctivitis. Most patients were white (n=230; 70.1%) and female (n=239; 72.9%). Of all enrolled patients, 328 were evaluable for analysis. Throughout the study, patients instilled 1 drop of olopatadine 0.2% into each eye once daily; adverse events were documented and ocular evaluations were conducted to ensure patient safety. Direct evaluations of efficacy were not performed. On days 1 and 7, patients completed the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, recorded their perceptions of olopatadine 0.1% (day 1) or 0.2% (day 7), and had their ocular allergies assessed globally. On each of the first 6 d of treatment, patients also completed a telephone-based perception questionnaire. On day 28, patients returned to the study center, reported their treatment perceptions, had their ocular allergies assessed, and exited the trial. Overall, patients had a positive perception of olopatadine 0.2%. Patients were more satisfied with olopatadine 0.2% than they remembered being with olopatadine 0.1% (289 vs 257 patients; 87.6% vs 77.8%; P<.05). The majority of the 48 patients who wore contact lenses (n=42; 88%) believed that they could wear their contacts as desired. Significant improvement was noted in all categories of the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (P<.0001). No unexpected safety findings were reported. Patients perceived olopatadine 0.2% to be effective and well tolerated | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
650 | 7 | |a Anti-Allergic Agents |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Dibenzoxepins |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Olopatadine Hydrochloride |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 2XG66W44KF |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Berdy, Gregg J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Lichtenstein, Steven J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Rubin, Jay M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Bloomenstein, Marc |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Prouty, Robert E |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vogelson, Cullen T |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Edwards, Michael R |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Waycaster, Curtis |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pasquine, Terri |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gross, Robert D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Robertson, Stella M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Advances in therapy |d 1990 |g 24(2007), 6 vom: 01. Nov., Seite 1221-32 |w (DE-627)NLM085859427 |x 1865-8652 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2007 |g number:6 |g day:01 |g month:11 |g pages:1221-32 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2007 |e 6 |b 01 |c 11 |h 1221-32 |