Cost-effectiveness of liquid-based cytology with or without hybrid-capture II HPV test compared with conventional Pap smears : a study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology
Many articles concerning conventional Pap smears, ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) and Hybrid-Capture II HPV test (HC II) have been published. This study, carried out by the French Society of Clinical Cytology, may be conspicuous for several reasons: it was financially independent; it compared the efficiency of the conventional Pap smear and LBC, of the conventional Pap smear and HC II, and included an economic study based on real costs; for all the women, a "gold standard" reference method, colposcopy, was available and biopsies were performed whenever a lesion was detected; The conventional Pap smear, the LBC (split-sample technique), the colposcopy, and the biopsies were done at the same time. This study included 2,585 women shared into two groups: a group A of a high-risk population, a group B of a screening population. The statistical analysis of the results showed that conventional Pap smears consistently had superior or equivalent sensitivity and specificity than LBC for the lesions at threshold CIN-I (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) or CIN-II or higher. It underlined the low specificity of the HC II. Finally, the LBC mean cost was never covered by the Social Security tariff.
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2005 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2005 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:33 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Diagnostic cytopathology - 33(2005), 5 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 338-43 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Cochand-Priollet, Béatrix [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Themen: |
Comparative Study |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 28.02.2006 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM158495373 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM158495373 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231223082322.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 231223s2005 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0528.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM158495373 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)16240398 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Cochand-Priollet, Béatrix |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Cost-effectiveness of liquid-based cytology with or without hybrid-capture II HPV test compared with conventional Pap smears |b a study by the French Society of Clinical Cytology |
264 | 1 | |c 2005 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 28.02.2006 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Many articles concerning conventional Pap smears, ThinPrep liquid-based cytology (LBC) and Hybrid-Capture II HPV test (HC II) have been published. This study, carried out by the French Society of Clinical Cytology, may be conspicuous for several reasons: it was financially independent; it compared the efficiency of the conventional Pap smear and LBC, of the conventional Pap smear and HC II, and included an economic study based on real costs; for all the women, a "gold standard" reference method, colposcopy, was available and biopsies were performed whenever a lesion was detected; The conventional Pap smear, the LBC (split-sample technique), the colposcopy, and the biopsies were done at the same time. This study included 2,585 women shared into two groups: a group A of a high-risk population, a group B of a screening population. The statistical analysis of the results showed that conventional Pap smears consistently had superior or equivalent sensitivity and specificity than LBC for the lesions at threshold CIN-I (Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia) or CIN-II or higher. It underlined the low specificity of the HC II. Finally, the LBC mean cost was never covered by the Social Security tariff | ||
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't | |
700 | 1 | |a Cartier, Isabelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a de Cremoux, Patricia |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Le Galès, Catherine |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Ziol, Marianne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Molinié, Vincent |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Petitjean, Alain |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Dosda, Anne |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Merea, Estelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Biaggi, Annonciade |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Gouget, Isabelle |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Arkwright, Sylviane |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vacher-Lavenu, Marie-Cécile |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Vielh, Philippe |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Coste, Joël |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Diagnostic cytopathology |d 1993 |g 33(2005), 5 vom: 15. Nov., Seite 338-43 |w (DE-627)NLM012620726 |x 1097-0339 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:33 |g year:2005 |g number:5 |g day:15 |g month:11 |g pages:338-43 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 33 |j 2005 |e 5 |b 15 |c 11 |h 338-43 |