Nasal versus oral fiberoptic intubation via a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) during spontaneous ventilation
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rate of nasal versus oral fiberoptic intubation in anesthetized patients breathing spontaneously via the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPAtrade mark).
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study.
SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals.
PATIENTS: Patients scheduled for general or plastic surgery of the torso or extremities.
INTERVENTIONS: Nasal (n=20) and oral (n=20) fiberoptic intubation were performed in patients while breathing spontaneously via the COPA during standardized anesthesia.
MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), oxygen saturation (SpO2), COPA size, difficult airway predictors, rate of failed ventilation via COPA, and frequency of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%) during the procedure, and perioperative untoward events were recorded.
MAIN RESULTS: The background, airway difficulty, vital signs and untoward effects were similar in the two groups. Nasal fiberoptic laryngeal view (scale 1-4) was better than the oral grading (3 [median] vs. 2, respectively; p <0.05). Eighty percent of the nasal intubations were successful compared with 40% of the oral intubations (p <0.05). Nasal intubations were accomplished within 153 +/- 15 SD seconds compared with 236 +/- 22 seconds (p <0.05) for the oral intubations, and less propofol was needed in the nasal intubations during the procedures (240 +/- 27 mg [nasal] vs. 277+/- 39 mg [oral]; p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Nasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy is more successful and easy than the oral approach in anesthetized patients who are breathing spontaneously through the COPA.
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2004 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2004 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:16 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of clinical anesthesia - 16(2004), 7 vom: 10. Nov., Seite 503-7 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Ezri, Tiberiu [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Themen: |
Clinical Trial |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 19.07.2005 Date Revised 07.12.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM152558926 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM152558926 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231223062253.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 231223s2004 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0509.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM152558926 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)15590253 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Ezri, Tiberiu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Nasal versus oral fiberoptic intubation via a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) during spontaneous ventilation |
264 | 1 | |c 2004 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 19.07.2005 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 07.12.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the success rate of nasal versus oral fiberoptic intubation in anesthetized patients breathing spontaneously via the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPAtrade mark) | ||
520 | |a DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, controlled study | ||
520 | |a SETTING: Two university-affiliated hospitals | ||
520 | |a PATIENTS: Patients scheduled for general or plastic surgery of the torso or extremities | ||
520 | |a INTERVENTIONS: Nasal (n=20) and oral (n=20) fiberoptic intubation were performed in patients while breathing spontaneously via the COPA during standardized anesthesia | ||
520 | |a MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data, mean arterial pressure, heart rate, end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2), oxygen saturation (SpO2), COPA size, difficult airway predictors, rate of failed ventilation via COPA, and frequency of hypoxemia (SpO2 < 90%) during the procedure, and perioperative untoward events were recorded | ||
520 | |a MAIN RESULTS: The background, airway difficulty, vital signs and untoward effects were similar in the two groups. Nasal fiberoptic laryngeal view (scale 1-4) was better than the oral grading (3 [median] vs. 2, respectively; p <0.05). Eighty percent of the nasal intubations were successful compared with 40% of the oral intubations (p <0.05). Nasal intubations were accomplished within 153 +/- 15 SD seconds compared with 236 +/- 22 seconds (p <0.05) for the oral intubations, and less propofol was needed in the nasal intubations during the procedures (240 +/- 27 mg [nasal] vs. 277+/- 39 mg [oral]; p <0.05) | ||
520 | |a CONCLUSIONS: Nasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy is more successful and easy than the oral approach in anesthetized patients who are breathing spontaneously through the COPA | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
700 | 1 | |a Szmuk, Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Evron, Shmuel |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Warters, Robert D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Herman, Oscar |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Weinbroum, Avi A |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of clinical anesthesia |d 1996 |g 16(2004), 7 vom: 10. Nov., Seite 503-7 |w (DE-627)NLM013003399 |x 1873-4529 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:16 |g year:2004 |g number:7 |g day:10 |g month:11 |g pages:503-7 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 16 |j 2004 |e 7 |b 10 |c 11 |h 503-7 |