Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot) in the acute treatment of migraine : a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison
Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel.
The 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) agonist eletriptan, at an oral dose of 80 mg, has been shown to be more efficacious than sumatriptan 100 mg and placebo in the treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura. Another commonly prescribed oral treatment for migraine attacks is Cafergot (1 mg ergotamine tartrate with 100 mg caffeine per tablet). The efficacy, tolerability and safety of 40- and 80-mg doses of eletriptan and 2 tablets of Cafergot were compared in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial involving 733 migraine patients. Patients recorded symptoms at baseline (before treatment) and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h after dosing. Headache intensity was assessed on a 4-point scale (3 = severe pain, 2 = moderate pain, 1 = mild pain, 0 = no pain). Significantly more eletriptan-treated patients (80 mg, 68%; 40 mg, 54%) than Cafergot-treated patients (33%; p < 0.001) reported headache response (improvement from moderate-to-severe to mild or no pain) at 2 h. Substantially more eletriptan recipients reported no pain (80 mg, 38%; 40 mg, 28%; Cafergot, 10%; placebo, 5%; p < 0.001). Eletriptan headache response rates at 1 h were significantly higher (80 mg, 39%; 40 mg, 29%; Cafergot, 13%; placebo, 13%; p < 0.002 for each comparison). Both doses of eletriptan were significantly more effective than Cafergot in reducing nausea (p < 0.0001), photophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.002), phonophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.003) and functional impairment (p < or = 0.001) at 2 h. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and transient. This randomised trial shows that oral eletriptan is more efficacious in the acute treatment of migraine than oral Cafergot and is well tolerated.
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2002 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2002 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:47 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
European neurology - 47(2002), 2 vom: 14., Seite 99-107 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Diener, Hans-Christoph [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 22.04.2002 Date Revised 01.11.2017 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM117310751 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM117310751 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231222180237.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 231222s2002 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0391.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM117310751 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)11844898 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Diener, Hans-Christoph |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Efficacy, tolerability and safety of oral eletriptan and ergotamine plus caffeine (Cafergot) in the acute treatment of migraine |b a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison |
264 | 1 | |c 2002 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 22.04.2002 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 01.11.2017 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel | ||
520 | |a The 5-HT(1B/1D/1F) agonist eletriptan, at an oral dose of 80 mg, has been shown to be more efficacious than sumatriptan 100 mg and placebo in the treatment of migraine attacks with or without aura. Another commonly prescribed oral treatment for migraine attacks is Cafergot (1 mg ergotamine tartrate with 100 mg caffeine per tablet). The efficacy, tolerability and safety of 40- and 80-mg doses of eletriptan and 2 tablets of Cafergot were compared in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial involving 733 migraine patients. Patients recorded symptoms at baseline (before treatment) and 1, 2, 4 and 24 h after dosing. Headache intensity was assessed on a 4-point scale (3 = severe pain, 2 = moderate pain, 1 = mild pain, 0 = no pain). Significantly more eletriptan-treated patients (80 mg, 68%; 40 mg, 54%) than Cafergot-treated patients (33%; p < 0.001) reported headache response (improvement from moderate-to-severe to mild or no pain) at 2 h. Substantially more eletriptan recipients reported no pain (80 mg, 38%; 40 mg, 28%; Cafergot, 10%; placebo, 5%; p < 0.001). Eletriptan headache response rates at 1 h were significantly higher (80 mg, 39%; 40 mg, 29%; Cafergot, 13%; placebo, 13%; p < 0.002 for each comparison). Both doses of eletriptan were significantly more effective than Cafergot in reducing nausea (p < 0.0001), photophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.002), phonophobia (80 mg, p < 0.0001; 40 mg, p < 0.003) and functional impairment (p < or = 0.001) at 2 h. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate and transient. This randomised trial shows that oral eletriptan is more efficacious in the acute treatment of migraine than oral Cafergot and is well tolerated | ||
650 | 4 | |a Clinical Trial | |
650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Multicenter Study | |
650 | 4 | |a Randomized Controlled Trial | |
650 | 7 | |a Drug Combinations |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Indoles |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Pyrrolidines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Serotonin Receptor Agonists |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Tryptamines |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a caffeine, ergotamine drug combination |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a eletriptan |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 22QOO9B8KI |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Caffeine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a 3G6A5W338E |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a Ergotamine |2 NLM | |
650 | 7 | |a PR834Q503T |2 NLM | |
700 | 1 | |a Jansen, Jan-Peter |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Reches, Avinoan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pascual, Julio |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Pitei, Daniela |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 1 | |a Steiner, Timothy J |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Eletriptan and Cafergot Comparative Study Group |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t European neurology |d 1968 |g 47(2002), 2 vom: 14., Seite 99-107 |w (DE-627)NLM000081302 |x 1421-9913 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:47 |g year:2002 |g number:2 |g day:14 |g pages:99-107 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 47 |j 2002 |e 2 |b 14 |h 99-107 |