Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects
The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of a non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane (Gore-Tex) versus a resorbable polyglactin membrane (Vicryl) and a newly designed collagenic membrane for enhancing bone regeneration on rat skull defects. The study was conducted on 30 adult Wistar rats. On each animal, two symmetrical, 6 mm wide, full-thickness, skull defects were created in the parietal regions. The right defect was chosen as the experimental site and the left one was left empty as a control. Each experimental site was covered by an inner and outer membrane. The 30 rats were divided into three groups: In group 1 (n=10), a non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane was used. In group 2 (n= 10), a resorbable polyglactin 910 membrane was used. In group 3 (n= 10), a collagen membrane processed from avian eggshell was used. In each group, the animals were euthanized at 60 days. The harvested specimens were processed for contact radiography and standard histological examination. The results were assessed by a Fisher's exact test. In group 1, partial bone healing was observed in seven out of 10 animals and complete in three out of 10 animals (P<0.001). In group 2, no or minimal bone healing was observed in seven out of 10 animals and partial bone healing was observed in three out of 10 animals. In group 3, no or minimal bone healing was observed in nine out of 10 cases and partial bone healing in only one animal. In conclusion, only the non-resorbable e-PTFE membrane group exhibited a favourable result in this study. This study suggests that the structure of the membrane is at least as important as its composition.
| Medienart: |
Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2001 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2001 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:30 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery - 30(2001), 1 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 58-62 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Dupoirieux, L [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 10.05.2001 Date Revised 24.11.2016 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
|---|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM111988594 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | NLM111988594 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20231222160801.0 | ||
| 007 | tu | ||
| 008 | 231222s2001 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
| 028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0374.xml |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)NLM111988594 | ||
| 035 | |a (NLM)11289623 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dupoirieux, L |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Comparative study of three different membranes for guided bone regeneration of rat cranial defects |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2001 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 500 | |a Date Completed 10.05.2001 | ||
| 500 | |a Date Revised 24.11.2016 | ||
| 500 | |a published: Print | ||
| 500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
| 520 | |a The purpose of the study was to compare the efficacy of a non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane (Gore-Tex) versus a resorbable polyglactin membrane (Vicryl) and a newly designed collagenic membrane for enhancing bone regeneration on rat skull defects. The study was conducted on 30 adult Wistar rats. On each animal, two symmetrical, 6 mm wide, full-thickness, skull defects were created in the parietal regions. The right defect was chosen as the experimental site and the left one was left empty as a control. Each experimental site was covered by an inner and outer membrane. The 30 rats were divided into three groups: In group 1 (n=10), a non-resorbable polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) membrane was used. In group 2 (n= 10), a resorbable polyglactin 910 membrane was used. In group 3 (n= 10), a collagen membrane processed from avian eggshell was used. In each group, the animals were euthanized at 60 days. The harvested specimens were processed for contact radiography and standard histological examination. The results were assessed by a Fisher's exact test. In group 1, partial bone healing was observed in seven out of 10 animals and complete in three out of 10 animals (P<0.001). In group 2, no or minimal bone healing was observed in seven out of 10 animals and partial bone healing was observed in three out of 10 animals. In group 3, no or minimal bone healing was observed in nine out of 10 cases and partial bone healing in only one animal. In conclusion, only the non-resorbable e-PTFE membrane group exhibited a favourable result in this study. This study suggests that the structure of the membrane is at least as important as its composition | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Comparative Study | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Azo Compounds |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Biocompatible Materials |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Coloring Agents |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Membranes, Artificial |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a trichrome stain |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Polyglactin 910 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 34346-01-5 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Methyl Green |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 82-94-0 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Polytetrafluoroethylene |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 9002-84-0 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Collagen |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a 9007-34-5 |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a Eosine Yellowish-(YS) |2 NLM | |
| 650 | 7 | |a TDQ283MPCW |2 NLM | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Pourquier, D |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Picot, M C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Neves, M |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery |d 1995 |g 30(2001), 1 vom: 24. Feb., Seite 58-62 |w (DE-627)NLM012633488 |x 1399-0020 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:30 |g year:2001 |g number:1 |g day:24 |g month:02 |g pages:58-62 |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 30 |j 2001 |e 1 |b 24 |c 02 |h 58-62 | ||