Life history evolution : successes, limitations, and prospects
Life history theory tries to explain how evolution designs organisms to achieve reproductive success. The design is a solution to an ecological problem posed by the environment and subject to constraints intrinsic to the organism. Work on life histories has expanded the role of phenotypes in evolutionary theory, extending the range of predictions from genetic patterns to whole-organism traits directly connected to fitness. Among the questions answered are the following: Why are organisms small or large? Why do they mature early or late? Why do they have few or many offspring? Why do they have a short or a long life? Why must they grow old and die? The classical approach to life histories was optimization; it has had some convincing empirical success. Recently non-equilibrium approaches involving frequency-dependence, density-dependence, evolutionary game theory, adaptive dynamics, and explicit population dynamics have supplanted optimization as the preferred approach. They have not yet had as much empirical success, but there are logical reasons to prefer them, and they may soon extend the impact of life history theory into population dynamics and interspecific interactions in coevolving communities.
Medienart: |
Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2000 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2000 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:87 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Die Naturwissenschaften - 87(2000), 11 vom: 16. Nov., Seite 476-86 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Stearns, S C [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Themen: |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
Date Completed 25.01.2001 Date Revised 18.03.2022 published: Print Citation Status MEDLINE |
---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
---|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
NLM110653386 |
---|
LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | NLM110653386 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20231222153933.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 231222s2000 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
028 | 5 | 2 | |a pubmed24n0369.xml |
035 | |a (DE-627)NLM110653386 | ||
035 | |a (NLM)11151666 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 1 | |a Stearns, S C |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Life history evolution |b successes, limitations, and prospects |
264 | 1 | |c 2000 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a Date Completed 25.01.2001 | ||
500 | |a Date Revised 18.03.2022 | ||
500 | |a published: Print | ||
500 | |a Citation Status MEDLINE | ||
520 | |a Life history theory tries to explain how evolution designs organisms to achieve reproductive success. The design is a solution to an ecological problem posed by the environment and subject to constraints intrinsic to the organism. Work on life histories has expanded the role of phenotypes in evolutionary theory, extending the range of predictions from genetic patterns to whole-organism traits directly connected to fitness. Among the questions answered are the following: Why are organisms small or large? Why do they mature early or late? Why do they have few or many offspring? Why do they have a short or a long life? Why must they grow old and die? The classical approach to life histories was optimization; it has had some convincing empirical success. Recently non-equilibrium approaches involving frequency-dependence, density-dependence, evolutionary game theory, adaptive dynamics, and explicit population dynamics have supplanted optimization as the preferred approach. They have not yet had as much empirical success, but there are logical reasons to prefer them, and they may soon extend the impact of life history theory into population dynamics and interspecific interactions in coevolving communities | ||
650 | 4 | |a Journal Article | |
650 | 4 | |a Review | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Die Naturwissenschaften |d 1947 |g 87(2000), 11 vom: 16. Nov., Seite 476-86 |w (DE-627)NLM00000832X |x 1432-1904 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:87 |g year:2000 |g number:11 |g day:16 |g month:11 |g pages:476-86 |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_NLM | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 87 |j 2000 |e 11 |b 16 |c 11 |h 476-86 |