Spatiotemporal patterns of pain distribution and recall accuracy: a dose-response study

Objectives Clinical decisions rely on a patient’s ability to recall and report their pain experience. Monitoring pain in real-time (momentary pain) may reduce recall errors and optimize the clinical decision-making process. Tracking momentary pain can provide insights into detailed changes in pain intensity and distribution (area and location) over time. The primary aims of this study were (i) to measure the temporal changes of pain intensity, area, and location in a dose-response fashion and (ii) to assess recall accuracy of the peak pain intensity and distribution seven days later, using a digital pain mapping application. The secondary aims were to (i) evaluate the influence of repeated momentary pain drawings on pain recall accuracy and (ii) explore the associations among momentary and recall pain with psychological variables (pain catastrophizing and perceived stress). Methods Healthy participants (N=57) received a low (0.5 ml) or a high (1.0 ml) dose of hypertonic saline (5.8%) injection into the right gluteus medius muscle and, subsequently, were randomized into a non-drawing or a drawing group. The non-drawing groups reported momentary pain intensity every 30-s. Whereas the drawing groups reported momentary pain intensity and distribution on a digital body chart every 30-s. The pain intensity, area (pixels), and distribution metrics (compound area, location, radiating extent) were compared at peak pain and over time to explore dose-response differences and spatiotemporal patterns. All participants recalled the peak pain intensity and the peak (most extensive) distribution seven days later. The peak pain intensity and area recall error was calculated. Pain distribution similarity was determined using a Jaccard index which compares pain drawings representing peak distribution at baseline and recall. The relationships were explored among peak intensity and area at baseline and recall, catastrophizing, and perceived stress. Results The pain intensity, area, distribution metrics, and the duration of pain were lower for the 0.5 mL than the 1.0 mL dose over time (p<0.05). However, the pain intensity and area were similar between doses at peak pain (p>0.05). The pain area and distribution between momentary and recall pain drawings were similar (p>0.05), as reflected in the Jaccard index. Additionally, peak pain intensity did not correlate with the peak pain area. Further, peak pain intensity, but not area, was correlated with catastrophizing (p<0.01). Conclusions This study showed differences in spatiotemporal patterns of pain intensity and distribution in a dose-response fashion to experimental acute low back pain. Unlike pain intensity, pain distribution and area may be less susceptible in an experimental setting. Higher intensities of momentary pain do not appear to influence the ability to recall the pain intensity or distribution in healthy participants. Implications The recall of pain distribution in experimental settings does not appear to be influenced by the intensity despite differences in the pain experience. Pain distribution may add additional value to mechanism-based studies as the distribution reports do not vary with pain catastrophizing. REC# N-20150052.

Medienart:	E-Artikel

Erscheinungsjahr:	2021
Erschienen:	2021

Enthalten in:	Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:22
Enthalten in:	Scandinavian journal of pain - 22(2021), 1 vom: 02. Aug., Seite 154-166

Sprache:	Englisch

Beteiligte Personen:	Galve Villa, Maria [VerfasserIn] Palsson, Thorvaldur S. [VerfasserIn] Boudreau, Shellie A. [VerfasserIn]

Links:	Volltext [lizenzpflichtig]

BKL:	44.90 / Neurologie

Anmerkungen:	© 2021 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston

doi:	10.1515/sjpain-2021-0032

funding:
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel:

PPN (Katalog-ID):	GRUY008852081