Peer Review Guidance: How Do You Write a Good Review?
Abstract Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2013 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2013 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:113 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of osteopathic medicine - 113(2013), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 916-920 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Allen, Thomas Wesley [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
Volltext [kostenfrei] |
---|
Anmerkungen: |
© 2013 The American Osteopathic Association |
---|
doi: |
10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
GRUY008318352 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | GRUY008318352 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20230813105251.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230811s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)GRUY008318352 | ||
035 | |a (DE-B1597)jaoa.2013.070-e | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
082 | 0 | 4 | |a 610 |q VZ |
100 | 1 | |a Allen, Thomas Wesley |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Peer Review Guidance: How Do You Write a Good Review? |
264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
500 | |a © 2013 The American Osteopathic Association | ||
520 | |a Abstract Peer review is essential to the quality of scientific publications. As the volume of submissions to these journals increases, the need for an expanding cadre of trained reviewers also increases. Many reviewers do not receive formal training on conducting a peer review or education on the peer review process, however. The author presents an overview of the peer review process and provides guidance for conducting high-quality reviews of manuscripts submitted to The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association and other scientific journals. | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of osteopathic medicine |d American Osteopathic Association, 2021 |g 113(2013), 12 vom: 01. Dez., Seite 916-920 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)GRUY007392176 |w (DE-600)3045278-8 |x 2702-3648 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:113 |g year:2013 |g number:12 |g day:01 |g month:12 |g pages:916-920 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://dx.doi.org/10.7556/jaoa.2013.070 |z kostenfrei |3 Volltext |
912 | |a GBV_GRUY | ||
912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 113 |j 2013 |e 12 |b 01 |c 12 |h 916-920 |