Fixed Spraying Systems Application in Citrus Orchards: Nozzle Type and Nozzle Position Effects on Droplet Deposition and Pest Control
Pesticide application is an essential means of controlling plant diseases and pests in citrus orchards. In recent years, fixed spraying systems have gradually been used as alternatives to traditional sprayers and manual sprayers in some hilly citrus orchards. In this paper, influences of fixed system spraying parameters, such as droplet size and spraying height, on spraying quality were elucidated and analyzed. The performances of two nozzle types, pressure-swirl nozzles and fixed spray plate sprinklers, were assessed and compared by effective droplet coverage ratio (DCR), droplet distribution uniformity coefficient of variation (CV), and droplet penetration ratio (DPR). The results showed that appropriately increasing droplet size and spraying height could improve the DCR and distribution uniformity of pressure-swirl nozzles. The DCR and distribution uniformity of fixed spray plate sprinklers had a positive correlation with droplet size, while spraying height had no significant effect on these variables. Additionally, with the increase in droplet size, DPR initially increased and then gradually decreased. The optimized results showed that the optimal parameters for pressure-swirl nozzles were a droplet size of 240 μm and spraying height of 100 cm, while for fixed spray plate sprinklers, the results were a droplet size of 240 μm and spraying height of 50 cm. Comparison results showed that the spraying quality of fixed spray plate sprinklers was better overall, with values of DCR, CV, and DPR being 37.15%, 24.20%, and 71.67%, respectively, while the corresponding values for pressure-swirl nozzles were 39.65%, 35.41%, and 56.02%. Based on the above results and the occurrence rule of citrus pests and disease, the optimal spraying parameters of fixed spraying systems were selected to control the Asian citrus psyllid <i<Diaphorina citri</i<. Furthermore, the effect of fixed spraying systems on controlling <i<Diaphorina citri</i< reached the maximum at 3 days after spraying, which was 97.83%, and the effect declined at 14 days after spraying, which was 85.47%. This study provides valuable scientific references for guiding the application of fixed spraying systems in hilly citrus orchards..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2023 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2023 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:13 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Agronomy - 13(2023), 11, p 2828 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Chen Chen [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Agriculture |
|---|
| doi: |
10.3390/agronomy13112828 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ101285833 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ101285833 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240414153555.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240414s2023 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/agronomy13112828 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ101285833 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3ba3d4e9e47b4338b450e969683a62b2 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Chen Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fixed Spraying Systems Application in Citrus Orchards: Nozzle Type and Nozzle Position Effects on Droplet Deposition and Pest Control |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2023 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Pesticide application is an essential means of controlling plant diseases and pests in citrus orchards. In recent years, fixed spraying systems have gradually been used as alternatives to traditional sprayers and manual sprayers in some hilly citrus orchards. In this paper, influences of fixed system spraying parameters, such as droplet size and spraying height, on spraying quality were elucidated and analyzed. The performances of two nozzle types, pressure-swirl nozzles and fixed spray plate sprinklers, were assessed and compared by effective droplet coverage ratio (DCR), droplet distribution uniformity coefficient of variation (CV), and droplet penetration ratio (DPR). The results showed that appropriately increasing droplet size and spraying height could improve the DCR and distribution uniformity of pressure-swirl nozzles. The DCR and distribution uniformity of fixed spray plate sprinklers had a positive correlation with droplet size, while spraying height had no significant effect on these variables. Additionally, with the increase in droplet size, DPR initially increased and then gradually decreased. The optimized results showed that the optimal parameters for pressure-swirl nozzles were a droplet size of 240 μm and spraying height of 100 cm, while for fixed spray plate sprinklers, the results were a droplet size of 240 μm and spraying height of 50 cm. Comparison results showed that the spraying quality of fixed spray plate sprinklers was better overall, with values of DCR, CV, and DPR being 37.15%, 24.20%, and 71.67%, respectively, while the corresponding values for pressure-swirl nozzles were 39.65%, 35.41%, and 56.02%. Based on the above results and the occurrence rule of citrus pests and disease, the optimal spraying parameters of fixed spraying systems were selected to control the Asian citrus psyllid <i<Diaphorina citri</i<. Furthermore, the effect of fixed spraying systems on controlling <i<Diaphorina citri</i< reached the maximum at 3 days after spraying, which was 97.83%, and the effect declined at 14 days after spraying, which was 85.47%. This study provides valuable scientific references for guiding the application of fixed spraying systems in hilly citrus orchards. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a fixed spraying systems | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hilly citrus orchards | |
| 650 | 4 | |a citrus canopy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a spraying quality | |
| 650 | 4 | |a spraying parameters | |
| 650 | 4 | |a control <i<D. citri</i< | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Agriculture | |
| 653 | 0 | |a S | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Xinyu Xue |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Qingqing Zhou |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Wei Gu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Songchao Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Chundu Wu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Agronomy |d MDPI AG, 2012 |g 13(2023), 11, p 2828 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000050482 |x 20734395 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:13 |g year:2023 |g number:11, p 2828 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112828 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3ba3d4e9e47b4338b450e969683a62b2 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/11/2828 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2073-4395 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 13 |j 2023 |e 11, p 2828 | ||