In vitro study on cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel titanium files in preparation for bending root canals
Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the anti cyclic fatigue performance of Woride KS (WKS), Proteper Gold (PTG), and Hyflex CM (HCM) nickel titanium instruments with different tip diameters in curved root canal models, and to provide reference for the targeted selection of suitable nickel titanium instruments in clinical preparation of curved root canals. Methods Three kinds of new nickel titanium files with 20# and 25# (0.20 mm and 0.25 mm) tip diameters were selected, including WKS (20/0.06), WKS (25/0.06), PTG (20/0.07), PTG (25/0.08), HCM (20/0.06), and HCM (25/0.06), each with 20 files. According to the recommended speed and torque of the motor, the anti cycle fatigue performance of the nickel titanium file was tested in 30° and 60° stainless steel root canal models. The time from rotation to fatigue fracture (TTF) of the nickel titanium file was recorded with a camera and timer, and the fragment length (FL) was measured and recorded with a Vernier scale. Results Comparison of TTF of the same type of file. ① WKS: the TTF of files with the same tip diameter in a 30° curved root canal was longer than 60° (P<0.05); The TTF of 25# nickel titanium files in the same angle curved root canal was longer than that of 20# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). ②PTG: the 20# nickel titanium files had a TTF longer than 60° in a 30° curved root canal (P<0.05), while the 25# nickel titanium files had no statistically significant difference in TTF between the 30° curved root canal and 60° curved root canal (P<0.05); In a 30° curved root canal, the TTF of 20# nickel titanium files was longer than that of 25# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). In a 60° curved root canal, there were no statistically significant difference between the TTF of 20# nickel titanium files and 25# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). ③HCM: the TTF of files with the same tip diameter in a 30° curved root canal was longer than 60° (P<0.05); The TTF of 20# nickel titanium files in the same angle curved root canal is longer than that of 25# nickel titanium filea. Comparison of TTF of different files: in a 30° curved root canal, there was no statistically significant difference in TTF among the three types of 20# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). The TTF of 25# WKS was longer than that of other files (P<0.05); In a 60 ° curved root canal, the TTF of 20# HCM was longer than other files with the same tip diameter (P<0.05), and the TTF of 25# WKS was longer than HCM with the same tip diameter (P<0.05). The FL of 20# PTG, 25# PTG, and 20# HCM in the 30° curved root canal model is significantly longer than that of 60° (P<0.05), while there is no statistical difference in FL among 20# WKS, 25# WKS, and 25# HCM in the 30° and 60° curved root canal models. Conclusion The anti cyclic fatigue performance of WKS is significantly superior to PTG and HCM in a 30° curved root canal. In a 60° curved root canal, 20# HCM had a significant advantage in terms of anti cyclic fatigue performance compared to other files, while only 25# WKS had a significant advantage in anti cyclic fatigue performance compared to HCM..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:32 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
口腔疾病防治 - 32(2024), 2, Seite 101-107 |
| Sprache: |
Chinesisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
WANG Yuxin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Anti cyclic fatigue， |
|---|
| doi: |
10.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2024.02.003 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ097400483 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ097400483 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413182758.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||chi c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2024.02.003 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ097400483 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ059eb55fab104432b8be173e3a90c26f | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a chi | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a WANG Yuxin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a In vitro study on cyclic fatigue resistance of three types of nickel titanium files in preparation for bending root canals |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in the anti cyclic fatigue performance of Woride KS (WKS), Proteper Gold (PTG), and Hyflex CM (HCM) nickel titanium instruments with different tip diameters in curved root canal models, and to provide reference for the targeted selection of suitable nickel titanium instruments in clinical preparation of curved root canals. Methods Three kinds of new nickel titanium files with 20# and 25# (0.20 mm and 0.25 mm) tip diameters were selected, including WKS (20/0.06), WKS (25/0.06), PTG (20/0.07), PTG (25/0.08), HCM (20/0.06), and HCM (25/0.06), each with 20 files. According to the recommended speed and torque of the motor, the anti cycle fatigue performance of the nickel titanium file was tested in 30° and 60° stainless steel root canal models. The time from rotation to fatigue fracture (TTF) of the nickel titanium file was recorded with a camera and timer, and the fragment length (FL) was measured and recorded with a Vernier scale. Results Comparison of TTF of the same type of file. ① WKS: the TTF of files with the same tip diameter in a 30° curved root canal was longer than 60° (P<0.05); The TTF of 25# nickel titanium files in the same angle curved root canal was longer than that of 20# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). ②PTG: the 20# nickel titanium files had a TTF longer than 60° in a 30° curved root canal (P<0.05), while the 25# nickel titanium files had no statistically significant difference in TTF between the 30° curved root canal and 60° curved root canal (P<0.05); In a 30° curved root canal, the TTF of 20# nickel titanium files was longer than that of 25# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). In a 60° curved root canal, there were no statistically significant difference between the TTF of 20# nickel titanium files and 25# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). ③HCM: the TTF of files with the same tip diameter in a 30° curved root canal was longer than 60° (P<0.05); The TTF of 20# nickel titanium files in the same angle curved root canal is longer than that of 25# nickel titanium filea. Comparison of TTF of different files: in a 30° curved root canal, there was no statistically significant difference in TTF among the three types of 20# nickel titanium files (P<0.05). The TTF of 25# WKS was longer than that of other files (P<0.05); In a 60 ° curved root canal, the TTF of 20# HCM was longer than other files with the same tip diameter (P<0.05), and the TTF of 25# WKS was longer than HCM with the same tip diameter (P<0.05). The FL of 20# PTG, 25# PTG, and 20# HCM in the 30° curved root canal model is significantly longer than that of 60° (P<0.05), while there is no statistical difference in FL among 20# WKS, 25# WKS, and 25# HCM in the 30° and 60° curved root canal models. Conclusion The anti cyclic fatigue performance of WKS is significantly superior to PTG and HCM in a 30° curved root canal. In a 60° curved root canal, 20# HCM had a significant advantage in terms of anti cyclic fatigue performance compared to other files, while only 25# WKS had a significant advantage in anti cyclic fatigue performance compared to HCM. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a nickel titanium instruments， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a anti cyclic fatigue， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a heat treatment， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a curvature， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a curved root canals， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a instrument separation， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a woride ks， | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hyflex cm， | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a R | |
| 700 | 0 | |a JIAO Rentian |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a ZHAO Ying |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a WANG Tianqi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a LIANG Guangzhi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t 口腔疾病防治 |d Editorial Department of Journal of Prevention and Treatment for Stomatological Diseases, 2019 |g 32(2024), 2, Seite 101-107 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000123072 |x 20961456 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:32 |g year:2024 |g number:2 |g pages:101-107 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.12016/j.issn.2096⁃1456.2024.02.003 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/059eb55fab104432b8be173e3a90c26f |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.kqjbfz.com/CN/10.12016/j.issn.2096-1456.2024.02.003 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2096-1456 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 32 |j 2024 |e 2 |h 101-107 | ||