A clinical case of post-COVID-19 myoendocarditis and arrhythmic syndrome at the outpatient stage
Background: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus entails the development of complications which affect the prognosis of the underlying disease. More than 40% of COVID-19 complications represent diseases of the cardiovascular system, most of which are the rhythm and conduction disturbances. In order to avoid these complications, it is necessary to detect cases of infection in a timely manner at the outpatient stage. Clinical case description: A 40-year-old patient came to the clinic with complaints of interruptions in the heart rhythm that appeared after the coronavirus infection. The laboratory examination (CBC) revealed signs of systemic inflammation (leukocytosis 12.6×109 U/l; erythrocyte sedimentation rate 18 mm/h, C-reactive protein 18 mg/l); the instrumental examination of the heart revealed the rhythm disturbances in the form of frequent ventricular ectopic activity and weakness of the SA node. The patient received propafenone (150 mg, 3 times a day) as a therapy with a positive effect. Against the background of improvement in the patient’s condition and despite the history of myocarditis and a positive result of enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (IgG, 10 BAU/ml), the patient was prescribed immunization with the CoviVac vaccine. After the immunization, the condition worsening was observed in the form of an increase in the rhythm disturbances, which required an inpatient treatment. A clinical diagnosis of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia — ventricular extrasystole was established, and the therapy was corrected. The outcome was favorable. Conclusion: Myocarditis is one of the most common complications of SARS-CoV-2 and should be kept in mind at all stages of medical care. This clinical case demonstrates the importance of the correct diagnosis and treatment of post-COVID myocarditis, as well as the need to assess contraindications for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with cardiac complications..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:14 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Клиническая практика - 14(2024), 4, Seite 94-99 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch ; Russisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Tatiana S. Pavlyukova [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Ambulatory |
|---|
| doi: |
10.17816/clinpract321381 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ097169625 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000naa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ097169625 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413174140.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240413s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.17816/clinpract321381 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ097169625 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ3467105cd52b4256aee7b47cc89e414e | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng |a rus | ||
| 100 | 0 | |a Tatiana S. Pavlyukova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A clinical case of post-COVID-19 myoendocarditis and arrhythmic syndrome at the outpatient stage |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Background: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus entails the development of complications which affect the prognosis of the underlying disease. More than 40% of COVID-19 complications represent diseases of the cardiovascular system, most of which are the rhythm and conduction disturbances. In order to avoid these complications, it is necessary to detect cases of infection in a timely manner at the outpatient stage. Clinical case description: A 40-year-old patient came to the clinic with complaints of interruptions in the heart rhythm that appeared after the coronavirus infection. The laboratory examination (CBC) revealed signs of systemic inflammation (leukocytosis 12.6×109 U/l; erythrocyte sedimentation rate 18 mm/h, C-reactive protein 18 mg/l); the instrumental examination of the heart revealed the rhythm disturbances in the form of frequent ventricular ectopic activity and weakness of the SA node. The patient received propafenone (150 mg, 3 times a day) as a therapy with a positive effect. Against the background of improvement in the patient’s condition and despite the history of myocarditis and a positive result of enzyme immunoassay for antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 (IgG, 10 BAU/ml), the patient was prescribed immunization with the CoviVac vaccine. After the immunization, the condition worsening was observed in the form of an increase in the rhythm disturbances, which required an inpatient treatment. A clinical diagnosis of recurrent ventricular arrhythmia — ventricular extrasystole was established, and the therapy was corrected. The outcome was favorable. Conclusion: Myocarditis is one of the most common complications of SARS-CoV-2 and should be kept in mind at all stages of medical care. This clinical case demonstrates the importance of the correct diagnosis and treatment of post-COVID myocarditis, as well as the need to assess contraindications for SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in patients with cardiac complications. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a clinical case | |
| 650 | 4 | |a covid-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a sars-cov-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a complications | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ambulatory | |
| 650 | 4 | |a polyclinic | |
| 650 | 4 | |a postovid syndrome | |
| 650 | 4 | |a myoendocarditis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a coronary infection | |
| 650 | 4 | |a arrhythmia | |
| 650 | 4 | |a holter monitoring of ecg | |
| 650 | 4 | |a vaccine | |
| 650 | 4 | |a diagnosis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a treatment | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
| 653 | 0 | |a R | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Tatiana S. Klimova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Elena Yu. Esina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Svetlana N. Lagutina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Olga S. Skuratova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Anna A. Zuikova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Irina S. Dobrynina |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Veronika I. Shevtsova |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Pavel A. Chizhkov |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Клиническая практика |d Eco-vector, 2020 |g 14(2024), 4, Seite 94-99 |w (DE-627)DOAJ078636620 |x 26188627 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:14 |g year:2024 |g number:4 |g pages:94-99 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.17816/clinpract321381 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/3467105cd52b4256aee7b47cc89e414e |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://journals.eco-vector.com/clinpractice/article/viewFile/321381/pdf |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2220-3095 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2618-8627 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 14 |j 2024 |e 4 |h 94-99 | ||