Efficacy of treating bacterial bioaerosols with weakly acidic hypochlorous water: A simulation chamber study
The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the dangers of airborne transmission and the risks of pathogen-containing small airborne droplet inhalation as an infection route. As a pathogen control, Weakly Acidic Hypochlorous Water (WAHW) is used for surface disinfection. However, there are limited assessments of air disinfection by WAHW against airborne pathogens like bioaerosols. This was an empirical study evaluating the disinfection efficacy of WAHW in an atmospheric simulation chamber system against four selected model bacteria. The strains tested included Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1). Each bacterial solution was nebulized into the chamber system as the initial step, and bioaerosol was collected into the liquid medium by a bio-sampler for colony forming units (CFU) determination. Secondly, the nebulized bacterial bioaerosol was exposed to nebulized double distilled water (DDW) as the control and nebulized 150 ppm of WAHW as the experimental groups. After the 3 and 30-min reaction periods, the aerosol mixture inside the chamber was sampled in liquid media and then cultured on agar plates with different dilution factors to determine the CFU. Survival rates were calculated by a pre-exposed CFU value as a reference point. The use of WAHW decreased bacterial survival rates to 1.65–30.15% compared to the DDW control. PAO1 showed the highest survival rates and stability at 3 min was higher than 30 min in all experiments. Statistical analysis indicated that bacteria survival rates were significantly reduced compared to the controls. This work verifies the bactericidal effects against Gram-positive/negative bioaerosols of WAHW treatment. As WAHW contains chlorine in the acid solution, residual chlorine air concentration is a concern and the disinfection effect at different concentrations also requires investigation. Future studies should identify optimal times to minimize the treated time range and require measurements in a real environment..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2024 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Heliyon - 10(2024), 5, Seite e26574- |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Saowanee Norkaew [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Bactericidal effect |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26574 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ092842836 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ092842836 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20240413165642.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 240412s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26574 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ092842836 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ34fc051e523f49419cf76f39abc10c53 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a Q1-390 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a H1-99 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Saowanee Norkaew |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Efficacy of treating bacterial bioaerosols with weakly acidic hypochlorous water: A simulation chamber study |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the dangers of airborne transmission and the risks of pathogen-containing small airborne droplet inhalation as an infection route. As a pathogen control, Weakly Acidic Hypochlorous Water (WAHW) is used for surface disinfection. However, there are limited assessments of air disinfection by WAHW against airborne pathogens like bioaerosols. This was an empirical study evaluating the disinfection efficacy of WAHW in an atmospheric simulation chamber system against four selected model bacteria. The strains tested included Staphylococcus aureus (SA), Escherichia coli (EC), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PAO1). Each bacterial solution was nebulized into the chamber system as the initial step, and bioaerosol was collected into the liquid medium by a bio-sampler for colony forming units (CFU) determination. Secondly, the nebulized bacterial bioaerosol was exposed to nebulized double distilled water (DDW) as the control and nebulized 150 ppm of WAHW as the experimental groups. After the 3 and 30-min reaction periods, the aerosol mixture inside the chamber was sampled in liquid media and then cultured on agar plates with different dilution factors to determine the CFU. Survival rates were calculated by a pre-exposed CFU value as a reference point. The use of WAHW decreased bacterial survival rates to 1.65–30.15% compared to the DDW control. PAO1 showed the highest survival rates and stability at 3 min was higher than 30 min in all experiments. Statistical analysis indicated that bacteria survival rates were significantly reduced compared to the controls. This work verifies the bactericidal effects against Gram-positive/negative bioaerosols of WAHW treatment. As WAHW contains chlorine in the acid solution, residual chlorine air concentration is a concern and the disinfection effect at different concentrations also requires investigation. Future studies should identify optimal times to minimize the treated time range and require measurements in a real environment. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Weakly acidic hypochlorous water | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bactericidal effect | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Gram-positive/negative bacteria | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Bioaerosols | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Biofilm | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Fomite | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Science (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Social sciences (General) | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Sumiyo Narikawa |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ukyo Nagashima |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ryoko Uemura |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Jun Noda |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Heliyon |d Elsevier, 2016 |g 10(2024), 5, Seite e26574- |w (DE-627)DOAJ000039969 |x 24058440 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2024 |g number:5 |g pages:e26574- |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e26574 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/34fc051e523f49419cf76f39abc10c53 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024026057 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2405-8440 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2024 |e 5 |h e26574- | ||