Does transanal drainage tubes placement have an impact on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract Background Whether Transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) placement reduces the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery remains controversial. Most existing meta-analyses rely on retrospective studies, while the prospective studies present an inadequate level of evidence. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on TDTs placement in RC patients after surgery was conducted. The main analysis index was the incidence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL, while secondary analysis index was the incidence of anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, and anastomotic stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed utilizing the databases Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. We recorded Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each included study, and a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to investigate the correlation between TDTs placement and four outcomes after RC surgery. Results Seven studies (1774 participants, TDT 890 vs non-TDT 884) were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of AL was 9.3% (83/890) in the TDT group and 10.2% (90/884) in the non-TDT group. These disparities were found to lack statistical significance (P = 0.58). A comprehensive meta-analysis, comprising four studies involving a cumulative sample size of 1259 participants, revealed no discernible disparity in the occurrence of Grade B AL or Grade C AL between the TDT group and the non-TDT group (Grade B AL: TDT 34/631 vs non-TDT 26/628, P = 0.30; Grade C AL: TDT 11/631 vs non-TDT 27/628, P = 0.30). Similarly, the incidences of anastomotic bleeding (4 studies, 876 participants), incision infection (3studies, 713 participants), and anastomotic stenosis (2studies, 561 participants) were 5.5% (24/440), 8.1% (29/360), and 2.9% (8/280), respectively, in the TDT group, and 3.0% (13/436), 6.5% (23/353), and 3.9% (11/281), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences were also determined to lack statistical significance (P = 0.08, P = 0.43, P = 0.48, respectively). Conclusion The placement of TDTs does not significantly affect the occurrence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL following surgery for rectal cancer. Additionally, TDTs placement does not be associated with increased complications such as anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, or anastomotic stenosis. Trial registration PROSPERO: CRD42023427914.
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2024 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2024 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:24 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
BMC Cancer - 24(2024), 1, Seite 12 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Yating Liu [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
Anastomotic leakage |
---|
doi: |
10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ091195799 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ091195799 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414051856.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 240412s2024 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ091195799 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ90eb716f019849ab85a60758bc6ec3ad | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
050 | 0 | |a RC254-282 | |
100 | 0 | |a Yating Liu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Does transanal drainage tubes placement have an impact on the incidence of anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer surgery? a systematic review and meta-analysis |
264 | 1 | |c 2024 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Abstract Background Whether Transanal drainage tubes (TDTs) placement reduces the occurrence of anastomotic leakage (AL) after rectal cancer (RC) surgery remains controversial. Most existing meta-analyses rely on retrospective studies, while the prospective studies present an inadequate level of evidence. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on TDTs placement in RC patients after surgery was conducted. The main analysis index was the incidence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL, while secondary analysis index was the incidence of anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, and anastomotic stenosis. A comprehensive literature search was performed utilizing the databases Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science. We recorded Risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for each included study, and a fixed-effect model or random-effect model was used to investigate the correlation between TDTs placement and four outcomes after RC surgery. Results Seven studies (1774 participants, TDT 890 vs non-TDT 884) were considered eligible for quantitative synthesis and meta-analysis. The meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of AL was 9.3% (83/890) in the TDT group and 10.2% (90/884) in the non-TDT group. These disparities were found to lack statistical significance (P = 0.58). A comprehensive meta-analysis, comprising four studies involving a cumulative sample size of 1259 participants, revealed no discernible disparity in the occurrence of Grade B AL or Grade C AL between the TDT group and the non-TDT group (Grade B AL: TDT 34/631 vs non-TDT 26/628, P = 0.30; Grade C AL: TDT 11/631 vs non-TDT 27/628, P = 0.30). Similarly, the incidences of anastomotic bleeding (4 studies, 876 participants), incision infection (3studies, 713 participants), and anastomotic stenosis (2studies, 561 participants) were 5.5% (24/440), 8.1% (29/360), and 2.9% (8/280), respectively, in the TDT group, and 3.0% (13/436), 6.5% (23/353), and 3.9% (11/281), respectively, in the non-TDT group. These differences were also determined to lack statistical significance (P = 0.08, P = 0.43, P = 0.48, respectively). Conclusion The placement of TDTs does not significantly affect the occurrence of AL, Grade B AL, and Grade C AL following surgery for rectal cancer. Additionally, TDTs placement does not be associated with increased complications such as anastomotic bleeding, incision infection, or anastomotic stenosis. Trial registration PROSPERO: CRD42023427914 | ||
650 | 4 | |a Transanal drainage tubes | |
650 | 4 | |a Rectal cancer | |
650 | 4 | |a Anastomotic leakage | |
650 | 4 | |a Prospective studies | |
650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
653 | 0 | |a Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens | |
700 | 0 | |a Xuhua Hu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yu Huang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Xu Yin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Pengfei Zhang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Yaoguang Hao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Hongyan Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Guiying Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t BMC Cancer |d BMC, 2003 |g 24(2024), 1, Seite 12 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000133191 |x 14712407 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:24 |g year:2024 |g number:1 |g pages:12 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/90eb716f019849ab85a60758bc6ec3ad |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-11990-8 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/1471-2407 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 24 |j 2024 |e 1 |h 12 |