Handgrip strength and health outcomes: Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess both the credibility and strength of evidence arising from systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies on handgrip strength and health outcomes. Methods: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies was conducted. We assessed meta-analyses of observational studies based on random-effect summary effect sizes and their p values, 95% prediction intervals, heterogeneity, small-study effects, and excess significance. We graded the evidence from convincing (Class I) to weak (Class IV). Results: From 504 articles returned in a search of the literature, 8 systematic reviews were included in our review, with a total of 11 outcomes. Overall, nine of the 11 of the outcomes reported nominally significant summary results (p < 0.05), with 4 associations surviving the application of the more stringent p value (p < 10−6). No outcome presented convincing evidence. Three associations showed Class II evidence (i.e., highly suggestive): (1) higher handgrip values at baseline were associated with a minor reduction in mortality risk in the general population (n = 34 studies; sample size = 1,855,817; relative risk = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.67–0.78), (2) cardiovascular death risk in mixed populations (n = 15 studies; relative risk = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.78–0.91), and (3) incidence of disability (n = 7 studies; relative risk = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.66–0.87). Conclusion: The present results show that handgrip strength is a useful indicator for general health status and specifically for early all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as disability. To further inform intervention strategies, future research is now required to fully understand mechanisms linking handgrip strength scores to these health outcomes..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2021 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2021 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:10 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Journal of Sport and Health Science - 10(2021), 3, Seite 290-295 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Pinar Soysal [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
Handgrip strength |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.009 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ055560296 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ055560296 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230503073240.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.009 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ055560296 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ9bf604d6f72c45aeb7adf3e76d8ff771 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a GV557-1198.995 | |
| 050 | 0 | |a RC1200-1245 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Pinar Soysal |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Handgrip strength and health outcomes: Umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Purpose: The aim of the present study was to assess both the credibility and strength of evidence arising from systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies on handgrip strength and health outcomes. Methods: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with meta-analyses of observational studies was conducted. We assessed meta-analyses of observational studies based on random-effect summary effect sizes and their p values, 95% prediction intervals, heterogeneity, small-study effects, and excess significance. We graded the evidence from convincing (Class I) to weak (Class IV). Results: From 504 articles returned in a search of the literature, 8 systematic reviews were included in our review, with a total of 11 outcomes. Overall, nine of the 11 of the outcomes reported nominally significant summary results (p < 0.05), with 4 associations surviving the application of the more stringent p value (p < 10−6). No outcome presented convincing evidence. Three associations showed Class II evidence (i.e., highly suggestive): (1) higher handgrip values at baseline were associated with a minor reduction in mortality risk in the general population (n = 34 studies; sample size = 1,855,817; relative risk = 0.72, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.67–0.78), (2) cardiovascular death risk in mixed populations (n = 15 studies; relative risk = 0.84, 95%CI: 0.78–0.91), and (3) incidence of disability (n = 7 studies; relative risk = 0.76, 95%CI: 0.66–0.87). Conclusion: The present results show that handgrip strength is a useful indicator for general health status and specifically for early all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, as well as disability. To further inform intervention strategies, future research is now required to fully understand mechanisms linking handgrip strength scores to these health outcomes. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Handgrip strength | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Health outcomes | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meta-analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Umbrella review | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Sports | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Sports medicine | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Christopher Hurst |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Jacopo Demurtas |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Joseph Firth |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Reuben Howden |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Lin Yang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Mark A. Tully |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ai Koyanagi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Petre Cristian Ilie |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Guillermo F. López-Sánchez |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Lukas Schwingshackl |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Nicola Veronese |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Lee Smith |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Sport and Health Science |d Elsevier, 2016 |g 10(2021), 3, Seite 290-295 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000083917 |x 20952546 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:10 |g year:2021 |g number:3 |g pages:290-295 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jshs.2020.06.009 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/9bf604d6f72c45aeb7adf3e76d8ff771 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095254620300752 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2095-2546 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 912 | |a SSG-OLC-PHA | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 10 |j 2021 |e 3 |h 290-295 | ||