Perceived infection transmission routes, infection control practices, psychosocial changes, and management of COVID-19 infected healthcare workers in a tertiary acute care hospital in Wuhan: a cross-sectional survey
Abstract Background Many healthcare workers were infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) early in the epidemic posing a big challenge for epidemic control. Hence, this study aims to explore perceived infection routes, influencing factors, psychosocial changes, and management procedures for COVID-19 infected healthcare workers. Methods This is a cross-sectional, single hospital-based study. We recruited all 105 confirmed COVID-19 healthcare workers in the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from February 15 to 29, 2020. All participants completed a validated questionnaire. Electronic consent was obtained from all participants. Perceived causes of infection, infection prevention, control knowledge and behaviour, psychological changes, symptoms and treatment were measured. Results Finally, 103 professional staff with COVID-19 finished the questionnaire and was included (response rate: 98.1%). Of them, 87 cases (84.5%) thought they were infected in working environment in hospital, one (1.0%) thought their infection was due to the laboratory environment, and 5 (4.9%) thought they were infected in daily life or community environment. Swab of throat collection and physical examination were the procedures perceived as most likely causing their infection by nurses and doctors respectively. Forty-three (41.8%) thought their infection was related to protective equipment, utilization of common equipment (masks and gloves). The top three first symptoms displayed before diagnosis were fever (41.8%), lethargy (33.0%) and muscle aches (30.1%). After diagnosis, 88.3% staff experienced psychological stress or emotional changes during their isolation period, only 11.7% had almost no emotional changes. Arbidol (Umifenovir; an anti-influza drug; 69.2%) was the drug most commonly used to target infection in mild and moderate symptoms. Conclusion The main perceived mode of transmission was not maintaining protection when working at a close distance and having intimate contact with infected cases. Positive psychological intervention is necessary..
| Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
|---|
| Erscheinungsjahr: |
2020 |
|---|---|
| Erschienen: |
2020 |
| Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:7 |
|---|---|
| Enthalten in: |
Military Medical Research - 7(2020), 1, Seite 13 |
| Sprache: |
Englisch |
|---|
| Beteiligte Personen: |
Ying-Hui Jin [VerfasserIn] |
|---|
| Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
|---|
| Themen: |
2019-nCoV |
|---|
| doi: |
10.1186/s40779-020-00254-8 |
|---|
| funding: |
|
|---|---|
| Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
| PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ034828168 |
|---|
| LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | DOAJ034828168 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230307192623.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 230227s2020 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1186/s40779-020-00254-8 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ034828168 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJbf98b132b92c44f6925700031e821bae | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 050 | 0 | |a R5-920 | |
| 100 | 0 | |a Ying-Hui Jin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Perceived infection transmission routes, infection control practices, psychosocial changes, and management of COVID-19 infected healthcare workers in a tertiary acute care hospital in Wuhan: a cross-sectional survey |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2020 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Abstract Background Many healthcare workers were infected by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) early in the epidemic posing a big challenge for epidemic control. Hence, this study aims to explore perceived infection routes, influencing factors, psychosocial changes, and management procedures for COVID-19 infected healthcare workers. Methods This is a cross-sectional, single hospital-based study. We recruited all 105 confirmed COVID-19 healthcare workers in the Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University from February 15 to 29, 2020. All participants completed a validated questionnaire. Electronic consent was obtained from all participants. Perceived causes of infection, infection prevention, control knowledge and behaviour, psychological changes, symptoms and treatment were measured. Results Finally, 103 professional staff with COVID-19 finished the questionnaire and was included (response rate: 98.1%). Of them, 87 cases (84.5%) thought they were infected in working environment in hospital, one (1.0%) thought their infection was due to the laboratory environment, and 5 (4.9%) thought they were infected in daily life or community environment. Swab of throat collection and physical examination were the procedures perceived as most likely causing their infection by nurses and doctors respectively. Forty-three (41.8%) thought their infection was related to protective equipment, utilization of common equipment (masks and gloves). The top three first symptoms displayed before diagnosis were fever (41.8%), lethargy (33.0%) and muscle aches (30.1%). After diagnosis, 88.3% staff experienced psychological stress or emotional changes during their isolation period, only 11.7% had almost no emotional changes. Arbidol (Umifenovir; an anti-influza drug; 69.2%) was the drug most commonly used to target infection in mild and moderate symptoms. Conclusion The main perceived mode of transmission was not maintaining protection when working at a close distance and having intimate contact with infected cases. Positive psychological intervention is necessary. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a SARS-CoV-2 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a 2019-nCoV | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Healthcare worker | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Healthcare professional | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Infection transmission route | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Medicine (General) | |
| 653 | 0 | |a Military Science | |
| 653 | 0 | |a U | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Qiao Huang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Yun-Yun Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Xian-Tao Zeng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Li-Sha Luo |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Zhen-Yu Pan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Yu-Feng Yuan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Zhi-Min Chen |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Zhen-Shun Cheng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Xing Huang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Na Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Bing-Hui Li |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Hao Zi |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ming-Juan Zhao |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Lin-Lu Ma |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Tong Deng |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Ying Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 700 | 0 | |a Xing-Huan Wang |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Military Medical Research |d BMC, 2014 |g 7(2020), 1, Seite 13 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000121924 |x 20549369 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:7 |g year:2020 |g number:1 |g pages:13 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1186/s40779-020-00254-8 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/bf98b132b92c44f6925700031e821bae |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40779-020-00254-8 |z kostenfrei |
| 856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2054-9369 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
| 912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
| 912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| 952 | |d 7 |j 2020 |e 1 |h 13 | ||