External Validation of Mortality Scores among High-Risk COVID-19 Patients: A Romanian Retrospective Study in the First Pandemic Year
Background: We aimed to externally validate three prognostic scores for COVID-19: the 4C Mortality Score (4CM Score), the COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (COVID-GRAM), and COVIDAnalytics. Methods: We evaluated the scores in a retrospective study on adult patients hospitalized with severe/critical COVID-19 (1 March 2020–1 March 2021), in the Teaching Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. We assessed all the deceased patients matched with two survivors by age, gender, and at least two comorbidities. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were computed for in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 780 severe/critical COVID-19 patients, 178 (22.8%) died. We included 474 patients according to the case definition (158 deceased/316 survivors). The median age was 75 years; diabetes mellitus, malignancies, chronic pulmonary diseases, and chronic kidney and moderate/severe liver diseases were associated with higher risks of death. According to the predefined 4CM Score, the mortality rates were 0% (low), 13% (intermediate), 27% (high), and 61% (very high). The AUROC for the 4CM Score was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67–0.77) for in-hospital mortality, close to COVID-GRAM, with slightly greater discriminatory ability for COVIDAnalytics: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71–0.80). Conclusion: All the prognostic scores showed close values compared to their validation cohorts, were fairly accurate in predicting mortality, and can be used to prioritize care and resources..
Medienart: |
E-Artikel |
---|
Erscheinungsjahr: |
2022 |
---|---|
Erschienen: |
2022 |
Enthalten in: |
Zur Gesamtaufnahme - volume:11 |
---|---|
Enthalten in: |
Journal of Clinical Medicine - 11(2022), 19, p 5630 |
Sprache: |
Englisch |
---|
Beteiligte Personen: |
Amanda Rădulescu [VerfasserIn] |
---|
Links: |
doi.org [kostenfrei] |
---|
Themen: |
COVID-19 |
---|
doi: |
10.3390/jcm11195630 |
---|
funding: |
|
---|---|
Förderinstitution / Projekttitel: |
|
PPN (Katalog-ID): |
DOAJ028320719 |
---|
LEADER | 01000caa a22002652 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | DOAJ028320719 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20240414184507.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 230226s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.3390/jcm11195630 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)DOAJ028320719 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)DOAJ41037d294b8f49c2b35ecf982c9abc96 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
100 | 0 | |a Amanda Rădulescu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a External Validation of Mortality Scores among High-Risk COVID-19 Patients: A Romanian Retrospective Study in the First Pandemic Year |
264 | 1 | |c 2022 | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a Background: We aimed to externally validate three prognostic scores for COVID-19: the 4C Mortality Score (4CM Score), the COVID-GRAM Critical Illness Risk Score (COVID-GRAM), and COVIDAnalytics. Methods: We evaluated the scores in a retrospective study on adult patients hospitalized with severe/critical COVID-19 (1 March 2020–1 March 2021), in the Teaching Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. We assessed all the deceased patients matched with two survivors by age, gender, and at least two comorbidities. The areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) were computed for in-hospital mortality. Results: Among 780 severe/critical COVID-19 patients, 178 (22.8%) died. We included 474 patients according to the case definition (158 deceased/316 survivors). The median age was 75 years; diabetes mellitus, malignancies, chronic pulmonary diseases, and chronic kidney and moderate/severe liver diseases were associated with higher risks of death. According to the predefined 4CM Score, the mortality rates were 0% (low), 13% (intermediate), 27% (high), and 61% (very high). The AUROC for the 4CM Score was 0.72 (95% CI: 0.67–0.77) for in-hospital mortality, close to COVID-GRAM, with slightly greater discriminatory ability for COVIDAnalytics: 0.76 (95% CI: 0.71–0.80). Conclusion: All the prognostic scores showed close values compared to their validation cohorts, were fairly accurate in predicting mortality, and can be used to prioritize care and resources. | ||
650 | 4 | |a COVID-19 | |
650 | 4 | |a mortality scores | |
650 | 4 | |a validation | |
650 | 4 | |a Romania | |
650 | 4 | |a comorbidities | |
653 | 0 | |a Medicine | |
653 | 0 | |a R | |
700 | 0 | |a Mihaela Lupse |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Alexandru Istrate |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Mihai Calin |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Adriana Topan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Nicholas Florin Kormos |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Raul Vlad Macicasan |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
700 | 0 | |a Violeta Briciu |e verfasserin |4 aut | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Clinical Medicine |d MDPI AG, 2013 |g 11(2022), 19, p 5630 |w (DE-627)DOAJ000006793 |x 20770383 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:11 |g year:2022 |g number:19, p 5630 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm11195630 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doaj.org/article/41037d294b8f49c2b35ecf982c9abc96 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/11/19/5630 |z kostenfrei |
856 | 4 | 2 | |u https://doaj.org/toc/2077-0383 |y Journal toc |z kostenfrei |
912 | |a GBV_USEFLAG_A | ||
912 | |a GBV_DOAJ | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
952 | |d 11 |j 2022 |e 19, p 5630 |